The Cincinnati Reds released a statement today, saying that the organization is 'devastated' by the 'horrific' actions of a Reds employee. What did the employee do?
A. Went on a shooting spree that killed 10 people
B. Had sex with a corpse in center field
C. Was caught with thousands of images of nude, young children on his laptop
D. Said the word 'fag'
Pray for Cincinnati
It was a classic hot-mic situation. And I get that he thought that the broadcast was still a few seconds away, but who in the world is dumb enough to say that while wearing the headset and mic??
That's like beating off during a Zoom Meeting at work because you're just sure that you turned off the camera on the laptop.
(no message)
If so, then obviously it's fine.
(no message)
"Peaceful protests" outside this guys house because you know someone will release his info?
(no message)
He'll be fired by E.O.D.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
BTW, not a fan of that nickname. Then again, maybe there is a story supporting that nickname I haven't heard yet.
(no message)
(no message)
Nary a whisper of disapproval from the moral young man of the hill while he was doing it.......repeatedly by the way.
(no message)
disapproval when the name came from me.
I figured you were a fan of hers, and you weren't using it out of approval. I try to agree with you, and you still want to be disagreeable. It is always more about the fight itself for you, than the issues which are fought about.
(no message)
You posted to pick a fight, apparently, and my agreeing with you didn't go according to your plans, so you kept poking. It really is weird behavior for an adult.
Now, you are using my reply to your poking to retroactively justify your pre-existing need for an argument. Again, weird.
The only reason you didn’t like it is because I used it. Before that, you expressed no objection to it. This was the point I was making. And no it wasn’t just directed at you.
I ignored that phrase. I didn't pile on and support it. You mentioned it, which was weird at first, and not just because it was out of place, but because I assumed you probably didn't like the phrase. So, I noted that I didn't like it, with the goal of setting out some common ground with you...you and me, brother, we can come together in our opposition to the phrase (to the extent I cared about it at all). But, obviously you couldn't let that happen. Again, very, very weird. You totally misunderstood my post, because you were itching for a fight. You got your fight I guess...a fight about something upon which we agree. Whatever.
Reread this thread when you come down off your internet troll high. I think you will find you have embarrassed yourself.
Again, the point for you and the other trumpies here.
Since you have descended to name calling, I will stop it here.
"BTW, not a fan of that nickname."
But you didn't like that, so you kept coming after me. You don't seem to be aware of what you are doing.