If this accounting is used as evidence (very believable accounting) this kid will serve a long, long time in prison.
The video testimony is very stark.
Link: Go to video in article
(no message)
Paint balls being shot at protesters isn't like a bullet. He was defending himself from others who might have killed him. So says your guy in the Whitehouse.
I haven’t defended this guy other than to acknowledge that after watching the videos, it does appear to be self defense in the first episode in which he was involved.
“He was an idiot for being down there“ is an argument. But it cedes the ability to defend one’s property.
You also have pure venom for the lawyer guy in the pink shirt defending his home with his wife.
It would appear that your agenda is to hate people who “resist back” at the rioters. That is quite odd.
No said you defended this guy, yet.
My thread is about the eye-witness testimony on a video that appears to be very compelling and clear.
How about you stick to the thread - at least once a month.
PS: The St Louis couple who pulled out their weapons had them in hand before the protesters opened the gate to the closed street.
As for the venom - there hasn't been from me. I've pointed out that the two lied about the gate being broken down and they lied about being
threatened. In fact now that you bring it up, they haven't stopped lying about the incident and have promoted Trumpian falsehoods about
the suburbs being over-run by violent gangs...!
Please stop the bullshit.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)