Menu
UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting
  • Football
    • 2024 Notre Dame Football Schedule
    • 2024 Notre Dame Roster
    • 2024 Notre Dame Coaching Staff
    • Injury News & Updates
    • Notre Dame Football Depth Charts
    • Notre Dame Point Spreads & Betting Odds
    • Notre Dame Transfers
    • NFL Fighting Irish
    • Game Archive
    • Player Archive
    • Past Seasons & Results
  • Recruiting
    • Commits
    • News & Rumors
    • Class of 2018 Commit List
    • Class of 2019 Commit List
    • Class of 2020 Commit List
    • Class of 2021 Commit List
    • Archives
  • History
    • Notre Dame Bowl History
    • Notre Dame NFL Draft History
    • Notre Dame Football ESPN GameDay History
    • Notre Dame Heisman Trophy Winners
    • Notre Dame Football National Championships
    • Notre Dame Football Rivalries
    • Notre Dame Stadium
    • Touchdown Jesus
  • Basketball
  • Forums
    • Chat Room
    • Football Forum
    • Open Forum
    • Basketball Board
    • Ticket Exchange
  • Videos
    • Notre Dame Basketball Highlights
    • Notre Dame Football Highlights
    • Notre Dame Football Recruiting Highlights
    • Notre Dame Player Highlights
    • Hype Videos
  • Latest News
  • Gear
  • About
    • Advertise With Us
    • Contact Us
    • Our RSS Feeds
    • Community Rules
    • Privacy Policy
  • RSS
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Home > Forums > The Open Forum
Login | Register
Upvote this post.
0
Downvote this post.

Facial recognition technology has a gender bias?

Author: (unknown user)(User Info Not Available)

Posted at 10:31 am on Sep 10, 2020
View Single

This seems like insanity. Will it next become illegal to use a cell phone camera to record an alleged felony?

Link: https://www.foxnews.com/us/portland-facial-recognition-technology-ban

Replies to: Facial recognition technology has a gender bias?


Thread Level: 2

Unbelievable!!! They are taking all the means from the police to do their job the best that they can

Author: THEISMANCARR (17217 Posts - Joined: Aug 10, 2007)

Posted at 4:41 pm on Sep 10, 2020
View Single

(no message)

Thread Level: 3

Meaningless... it's happening in cities that are defunding police or granting automatic bail

Author: Curly1918 (16474 Posts - Joined: Aug 30, 2017)

Posted at 4:50 pm on Sep 10, 2020
View Single

(no message)

Thread Level: 3

They temporarily got them to stop using tear gas to disburse the rioters

Author: Stark Raving Dad (5192 Posts - Joined: Aug 19, 2020)

Posted at 4:48 pm on Sep 10, 2020
View Single

Apparently the gas was making the White Antifa & BLM domestic terrorists gag and wheeze. And well...we can't have that. Resistance and all. Luckily that got reversed if a riot is declared, so they declare a riot and gas the pricks.

As the good book teaches...too fucking bad snowflake!

SRD


This message has been edited 1 time(s).

"It’s always a wonder how you all are experts in everything." jimbasil 6/26/2022
Thread Level: 2

Wait til they come out with mask recognition technology...

Author: iairishcheeks (27295 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 1:18 pm on Sep 10, 2020
View Single

(no message)

Thread Level: 2

What is it that bothers you about banning its use?

Author: jimbasil (52683 Posts - Joined: Nov 15, 2007)

Posted at 10:57 am on Sep 10, 2020
View Single

(no message)

Jack, he is a banker
and Jane, she is a clerk
Thread Level: 3

It allows criminals to potentially remain anonymous.

Author: (unknown user)(User Info Not Available)

Posted at 1:10 pm on Sep 10, 2020
View Single

Facial recognition should not be used as SOLE evidence of guilt.
But it could be used to assist law enforcement in establishing potential suspects.

It is better than "fits the description" verbal accounts. Or "leads" from dubious informants.

Legit alibis would completely neuter misidentification.

Burden of proof is still on the prosecutor.


Thread Level: 3

Haven't heard about this until today.

Author: Stark Raving Dad (5192 Posts - Joined: Aug 19, 2020)

Posted at 12:59 pm on Sep 10, 2020
View Single

I suspect it's our leadership removing a tool from LE to curtail rioting. You know...resistance and all. But agree...not overly concerned with this.

I do find it laughable The claim that facial recognition technology is somehow racist or gender biased. That's just absurd.

SRD


"It’s always a wonder how you all are experts in everything." jimbasil 6/26/2022
Thread Level: 4

Terminology used is questionable, but conceptually it's not absurd.

Author: iairishcheeks (27295 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 1:08 pm on Sep 10, 2020
View Single

If you train the model on a sample of 100 pink elephants bit only 20 blue elephants, it'll likely be better able to identify accurately pink elephants. Or if the nature of the lighting provides better contrast for pink elephants, etc.

I did some machine vision work back in the day, some objects are just easier to analyze than others for a variety of reasons, color being one.


Thread Level: 5

Welp, you would know better than I it seems...

Author: Stark Raving Dad (5192 Posts - Joined: Aug 19, 2020)

Posted at 1:32 pm on Sep 10, 2020
View Single

Skynet is aware!

Nevertheless I would advise my fellow Portlanders try not breaking the law. See if that eases your fears of facial recognition...

SRD


"It’s always a wonder how you all are experts in everything." jimbasil 6/26/2022
Close
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • RSS