(no message)
And reported income in the sub-company that had the account (among other activities)? You assume that this was a bribe, apparently? ...That they reported on US taxes? And you got your information from tax returns illegally obtained by the New York Times?
I thought you guys got all worked up about hacked or stolen information.
At any rate, what is your issue with this particular “revelation”?
When was the account established? For what purpose?
Deposits/income stream each year? Source of income stream?
Withdraws/expenditures each year? to where?
Has the above changed since JAN 2017? Why?
Does any of the above reflect any conflicts of interests that the public/Congress should know about?
(no message)
requirements are very stringent.
Let us see if we can find some consensus:
Can we agree that elected officials ought not accept bribes?
Can we agree that elected officials ought not accept material gifts that suggest a quid pro quo?
Can we agree that elected officials have a sworn duty to avoid conflicts of interest?
Can we agree that elected officials should avoid the appearance of impropriety?
Can we agree that elected officials ought not use their office to procure financial benefits for their family members?
Can we agree that elected officials should be completely transparent re their financial dealings with third parties? Including their tax returns?
Can we agree that scrutiny should be heightened when a foreign nation or entity is involved?
Can we agree that all of the above is heightened when the elected official is the President, Vice President, Senator, or Congressman?
Can we agree that elected officials ought not obstruct investigations and requests for information?
Can we agree that voters should oust elected officials who violate the fundamental tenets of public service outlined above?
(no message)