...Vice- President-Elect Harris will counsel them on how irresponsible that is...right?
(no message)
(no message)
Link: Was the Pfizer vaccine part of the government’s Operation Warp Speed?
First, if that vaccine had been put out by Election Day it would have been rushed. It is now following the normal approval process.
Second, will their nation’s scientific community review and sign off on it first? If so, again not rushed.
Third, Pfizer has taken pains to point out that they developed this vaccine separately from the Government’s “Warp Speed” program. Not sure that it’s accurate to call it Trump’s vaccine.
"process" tand protocols hey were following a week ago.
The first one out .would have been Trump's "rushed" vaccine (As if Pfizer working in conjunction with German firm BioNtech was abandoning protocols to get Trump re-elected.) The only difference at all now is that Trump was not re-elected. Now we can trust the process...
I do expect the Spain's scientific community to sign off on it...as I did here.
The point was calling out Harris et al for political hackery...which it was.
which is what Orange wanted. If they had to get them out 11/3 they would have been rushed. No other way to do it. FDA reused to bow to Orange for once.
Not so much....
We're apparently looking to have first responders, health care providers and nursing home residents vaccinated by Biden's inauguration day...
Starting on general population about 1 year after commencing flattening the curve....
Link: Scientists Are Struggling With the Feeling of Being Against a Rushed Vaccine
That’s dangerous and irresponsible and he was rightly called on it.
If it can be put out there by 1/1 following established protocols, fine. If not, it shouldn’t be rushed now either. Not that hard. Is someone saying we should ignore protocols to get it out by 1/1?
(no message)
them to follow.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
November 2 = Rushed!
November 9 = normal process!
Election 2016 - fraud!
Election 2020 - no way you rube.
Healing!
(no message)
Libbies and never trumpers cried like stuck pigs.
achieve a transition. They didn’t say there was fraudulent result.
(no message)
overturned in 2016 like Orange is doing right now? Obama? Biden? Hillary? Pelosi? Schumer?
The bitching about the popular vote. The howls about the electoral college. The rioting that took place that night and in the days after. Not to mention the Russia fever dream, claims of pee pee tapes, rumors of clandestine meetings with despots, and then the most bogus of bogus impeachment proceedings over a fucking phone call that was at worst the exact same thing the Delaware Drooler bragged about and was lauded for as a tough guy! That NEVER happened. No Democratic law maker EVER called the election fraudulent or corrupt or screamed impeachment that mother fucker! No silent coup to reverse the election was ever conducted. It was all a bad dream.
With all due respect Frank, that's nonsense. It was ALL an effort to overturn, recall, invalidate, upend, undue, redirect the 2016 election. Whatever you choose to call it!
You've been hoodwinked! Bamboozled! Led astray! Turned asunder!
The losing side always bitches in an election.
They don’t balk at transitioning the government to the election winner. Just this guy and his enablers.
You sowed it you'll reap it. So there's that. Spare everyone your righteous indignation.
Anywho....this has been a thin slice of heaven! Have a good evening Frank.
(no message)
(no message)
Probably.