Judge Brann is a 1987 graduate from the University of Notre Dame.
Link: Welcome to the world of real lawyers
But I’m not up to date on that jurisprudence. Do you have an opinion on that?
(no message)
I'm not an in-court civil litigator, and I will defer to them (I don't believe conor is a federal court civil litigator), but I've managed a fair number of federal litigations (as the client), and the courts seem to bend over backwards to entertain the craziest arguments. The bar is set quite low. The courts clearly lean towards "access to the courts" and away from punishing frivolous lawsuits. Until we get "loser pays" this will always be a problem. Rule 11 seems to solve maybe 10-20% of cases I would call frivolous. Just my impression. I would welcome a federal civil litigator to comment.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
was working with a Russian intelligence agent over the Hunter nonsense. The problem though pales when we have a nutso, mad king king prez who won’t acknowledge he lost the election.
(no message)
One of the Americans who kept a watchful eye was Chris Krebs.
Trump fired Krebs for being diligent and honest.
And feel free to read about the Russian interference that transpired in 2016. Your post suggests otherwise.
Link: For those who think the 2016 Russian interference was a hoax
(no message)
(no message)
with him.
(no message)
(no message)
if there is material evidence (and i am not implying or stipulating there is, so don't misquote me again), you should want to get a ruling on it. by suppressing it, you invite doubt about your own motives and the legality of your own claims. all we're saying is let the system decide so there will be no doubt going forward.
(no message)
(no message)
it all.