Saying there is not enough evidence to overturn the results of November 3rd is absurd. All of the eyewitnesses and all of the forensics are there. Sorry to break the news to you, but Joe and Jill Biden are not more popular in the black community than Barack and Michelle Obama, and there was no epiphany for Joe and Jill to reach the peak of their popularity only in key States, only in key counties, only in key cities, and only between the hours of 1 and 7 AM in the morning, and that is not the only evidence. You don’t always need a confession in order to convict, and this one is not even that difficult, if we can find any honest and courageous judges and legislatures left in America.
I know if hurts when you discover your favorite celebrity is not who you imagined them to be, and the idea of America and the American Election is the greatest celebrity in all the world. Therefore, jury nullification and burying your head in the sand is not the answer. No matter how much it pains us we must face the truth or America is in fact dead.
November 3rd (and 4th) was not an election; it was a selection. Joe Biden was not elected president, he was selected by the media and nefarious forces within and sympathetic to the Democratic Party. Joe Biden is not the president elect; he is the President Select, and despite the media’s attempted blackout the whole world knows it.
The world knows how quick the American media and American politicians are to criticize elections in other countries. If Joe Biden is installed in the Oval office, we have lost all moral authority, don’t expect for the world to go back to business as usual. If Biden is installed, any team of international “election observers” becomes an instant farce if Americans are included. Even after Biden leaves office that taint will remain. (Yes, I now realize that whatever the media chose to report about “international election observers” in the past—or present—is suspect, but the stench is even greater going forward.)
Funny how no “news” organizations are comparing what the best standards are for international election observers and election security in foreign lands to what we accept in some jurisdictions here in America.
If Joe Biden is installed, don’t bother us with any media reports and protestations about elections in RUSSIA! China, Venezuela, Chile, Nicaragua, North Korea, or any place else.
Also, don’t bother us with media complaints when a woman is raped and the perpetrator is set free because the jury chose to ignore the evidence. Don’t complain when stores are robbed and looted, and police officers are ambushed and killed (ops, scratch that one, there are already very little media complaints about that. If fact, the media cheer on, and selects to the highest office, those responsible for bailing these perpetrators out of jail).
Have you noticed the two-tier injustice system over the past four years? Why don’t we see thousands of complaints of voter fraud in Republican precincts? Why do we see people cheering when Republican observers are removed? How difficult is it for a biased precinct supervisor to manufacture scenarios of disruption, or magnify and characterize legitimate partisan observer questions as disruptions, just so they may use that ruse to order the police to remove the observer? Why is this happening so much in Democrat precincts in key areas? Our elections do not belong to them, our elections are for all of us. Where are the consequences? Where is the equal protection?
And by all means, please spare us the fits of emotion and the continual outrage and criticism of any jury who decides to let a murderer go free despite the “mountain of evidence”.
When it’s time to make serious money and crank up the military industrial complex again, I am sure the media—who remained silent as God was removed from our pledge and our flag was burned—will lavish effusive praise for our soldiers’ patriotism as they send them off to die for a charlatan, and for the ideals of an American democracy that no longer exist.
If Joe Biden or his vice president becomes commander in chief don’t ever use the phrase “American moral authority” again unless you are willing to understand that the world and its leaders that are smiling in your face are laughing behind your back, as the world knows you are stripped and naked. And not just naked chasing your dog down an alley. Literally, the Emperor With No Clothes “Wag[s] the Dog” – how fitting.
I know that facts are sometimes hard to face, but just because we don’t want to believe it doesn’t mean we should not face them. If America is to be murdered in the face of cowardice, there is a remnant of some remaining who refuse to participate in slitting her throat.
Mr. Kalc, South Bend, Indiana
P.S. I am proud of what the American people themselves have done. I expected to feel sadness after what took place, but instead I feel a since of admiration, because despite all the misinformation and the attacks they rejected the mob and saw to it that our president was reelected in overwhelming numbers. He was just not selected. Now we will see if we have political and judicial leaders with the courage to ensure our voices are heard.
I recommend that you donate generously to Giuliani and Powell to fund these lawsuits. Our democracy depends on it.
You people are pure idiots. It's embarrassing that this site is related to Notre Dame.
Seeing there actually is no evidence should have you all believing in the conspiracy.
Or. Whatever Trump says, you believe.
(no message)
forensics are there.” The DOJ and Billy Barr are also there. You really think that he would ignore all of the eyewitnesses and forensics if they were really there? Yet Barr said there was no evidence of fraud that would change the result. You folks really are crazy.
Do you really think the people in charge of maintaining the integrity of the election would come out and admit this? It would absolutely destroy this country with the largest scandal/crime, x10, in U.S. history.
Not saying it happened. But if it did, we'd never hear them admit it.
looked into them. They’re bogus.
theories is a bridge too far. Three and a half years of one of that crapola that you guys were pumping here for hours per day over that stretch, all for naught, should've given you pause and prompted you to pull back from castigating others on similar counts.
Did the three and a half year, quixotic journey help or harm "our democracy?"
Do you believe the crap the OP posted?
There actually WAS collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia. Proven with, you know, evidence.
There is no evidence for this bilge.
Carry on.
The most effective deconstructions of Russiagate were lefty journalists, like Mate.
Link: https://mondediplo.com/2019/05/02russiagate-end
But I’d rather try to explain it to my dog.
And what was that collusion?
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
The biggest proven collusion between the campaign and the Russians was Manafort giving them campaign polling data while they were running a disinformation campaign.
campaign colluded with them, they did.
This prez election was absolutely not fixed and you know it.
Do you think that we should ignore the fraud that occurred in 2020 if it did not affect the outcome of the election?
outcome. I also know, and Bill Barr agrees, that there is no evidence of election altering fraud occurring in 2020.
But rage on about us resisting this time around.
Plus I do think there is one. Whether Orange is in it is the debatable point.
By the way, why the name calling in the post below? Thought that offended you.
Shouldn’t be pushing your fantasy’s off on other people. And I don’t offend easily. I just gave you credit for 3 insults in one post. I usually get a shitty gram for one.
make your choices and damn everyone else.
And you are a hypocrite to boot on personal insults.
Want me to send you a postcard from vacation since you're scared to take one? You can live through me if you want.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Russia collusion was a hoax.
And, it is funny how you guys can say a few Russia paid facebook ads can swing the election, but not actual voter fraud. That takes a special kind of disingenuity, in which you seem to specialize.
...because Trump told you. Never mind that he is a constant, inveterate liar.
So I guess you are consistent.
You say: "The Russia interference was not a hoax"
Privately, you mean Russia funded some Facebook ads, which everyone knows, and no one denies. No one is referring to that when they say the Russian interference was a hoax.
Publicly, you hope people think you are talking about Russia collusion between Trump and Putin. That is the hoax.
the last month. You also leave out the proven collusion of the Tower meeting as well as Manafort giving them campaign polling data and offering them a briefing. So, no he isn’t lying. You are shuffling.
Who stole the emails?
Why don't you explain how the Tower meeting proves collusion? Of course it doesn't. Total nonsense.
Manafort offering data?...how did that affect the election? You are really reaching here, trying to make something of nothing.
But, the good news is, you have succeeded in lowing the standard of American politics, and now, pretty much any accusation is good for a 72 news cycle, and then you can bring it up years later after it goes away. Well done.
Manafort didn’t just offer them campaign data. He gave it to them. That is collusion. It’s also pretty obvious why he gave it them given the disinformation campaign they were running. It’s also collusion to meet with a foreign adversary who is offering dirt to you on the opposing candidate. These are the ones we know about and can prove.
Now Neddie dear, what evidence of voter fraud that impacted the outcome of this election do you have?
I haven't been paying much attention to the fraud investigation. I've seen montages and interviews with a lot personal testimony from a lot of different precincts around the country regarding the fraud.
in them for the last month of the campaign. We know the Russians stole them from our intelligence. See both Senate and Mueller reports.
And even though you haven’t been following it closely, you still are asserting massive fraud.
You are a beauty.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
False equivalence.
(no message)