I tell you Trump cultist you are embarrassing yourself. You’re no better than the other side. Why
can’t we stop the tribal politics and choose a real leader with character.
Replies to: I tell you Trump cultist you are embarrassing yourself. You’re no better than the other side. Why
Funny... you think there are politicians with character.
(no message)
What does that even mean? “A real leader with character” Wasn’t Joe that guy?
Trump shouldn’t run in 2024, but we’re stuck with identity politics for the next couple cycles at least, so this high character thing will be about 5th on peoples’ list.
And people like Condi Rice who might scratch both itches don’t want to touch the White House with a 10 foot pole.
Except Hunter was the character...
(no message)
Charlie Sheen caught syphilis from Hunter.
(no message)
You Fxxxing TDS. We don't vote for Trump, we vote for Trumpism, the policies. He doesn't talk like
politicians and doesn't behave like politicians, we don't care. We know he is not politician. We care the policy, i.e. what he did. He is the only president I know who tried his best to do what he promised the voters in his policies.
4. Trump did 1,2,3 with nobody. He came to DC alone, only with his daughter, son in law
His approach to governing certainly was unconventional. He didn't have 54 czars like Obama had. Half positions of state department was unfilled.... So what? His approach at least saves taxpayers money.
3 Oversea, Trump launched tit-for-tat trade war with China. Even Biden didn't change any
those tariffs that Trump imposed. He withdrew from several multilateral agreements and then signed new one with better terms. Even Pelosi couldn't delay their ratification. Trump forged closer ties with Israel which is truly American ally.
2. at home, he got the largest corp tax cut, reshaped fed judiciary, eliminated so many regulations
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
The ass tumors vote for Trump. That should be all you need to know.
(no message)
Drinking on a Sunday night? We prefer the term “Trumporrhoids”.
(no message)
"Buttload of deplorables"...would also be acceptable.
(no message)
1. Trump's stunning victory 2016 is a message of fxxx you to globalists of establishment from voters
(no message)
.
(no message)
Judging by what I see on the left here. I'm much better than the other side.
(no message)
How many times did you vote for the cult leader? You know him so
well because you’re his neighbor.
Twice unfortunately. But couldn’t vote for Hillary.
(no message)
Exactly. Golf clap. If you listen on here most people don’t want him to run again
including myself.Hopefully he goes away
and another candidate comes forward and Mr Potato Head and Giggles will be gone in a few years,
I'm not sure you're the best spokesperson for the anti trump ballot. Good you see the light
I don't know for a fact, but I do know it's true - When the presidential election comes around again and Trump is on the ballot
you will not be voting for a Democrat therefore you will be voting for Trump.
You are impossible and have little courage. I won’t vote for Trump but your problem is that
your candidate Bernie Sanders is too old old to run. You don’t have a single bit of honestly in your soul. You are a dyed in the wool liberal that never considers how you have been wrong for years.
Your intellect is limited by your ridiculous bias. Which makes you appear dumb. Stay in your bubble of stupid like/minded losers.
Sanders isn't and wasn't my choice at all. Not even close - Neither was Biden. Most definitely,
Trump will never be. In fact, It will take some doing for me to ever vote for a Republican again. I've never known such poor leadership and
governance as I see with the Republicans these last 4 decades. And it's not getting better - Reagan was just awful and then we get W Bush
and after that failure you send us Trump. Amazing. In 2000 was the best candidate year R's have had in those 4 decades and you all chose
WBush. A true mind bender.
Who was your preferred Dem candidate?
(no message)
Pete Buttigieg
(no message)
Fair enough. I asked & you answered honestly. Mine is Ron DeSantis.
(no message)
And that says it all. Of course, it’s Mayor Pete. Hysterical.
(no message)
Why, "Hysterical."?
(no message)
That’s hilarious. The mayor of South Bend? Are you serious. Much experience there.
(no message)
You're serious? You who voted for Trump are going to talk about experience? Almost genius, you are.
(no message)
Mayor Pete will be in the discussion should JB step aside...his intelligence is 6-sigma from DJT,
and he's gaining major domestic experience with the Infrastructure Bill implementation...lots of connections as well, all over the country. He's fearless and perfectly able to take on opposing views (see his stints on FOX TV)...way too early to call, but he's in position to make some noise.
"Should JB step aside"? That's funny right there...
The Democrats are going to make him step aside.
He's going to get better at 82?
OTOH, how has Joe's 50 yrs of experience served him? One can be an incompetent forever.
(no message)
The other side? You mean, they're not better than you?
(no message)
Dumb post requires no answer since you know the truth.
(no message)
Hey, you're the one who posted "you're no better than the other side." which would mean
you as a trump voter, now denouncing his nibs, means, you are now on the other side - Get the point?
They're no better than you.
It’s not binary. Seems I have a broader mind than you. It’s not Trump or Biden. I could find someone
in the phone book, if they still existed, better than both of them.
Please provide the audio of "all I need is you to find me another 11,000 votes" you claimed below.
You embarassed yourself below. You didn't know the audio claims by WaPo were fake, and you were not aware that the WaPo had retracted the story 2 months later.....proving the effectiveness of their intentional fake news strategy against Trump.
I provided you with the entire, unedited audio released by the WaPo 2 months after the false claims, and on the day they issued their retraction quietly.
You asked me if I had listened to the audio - which I did - but you yourself clearly had never listened to it yourself.
On the off chance that you have a different audio, i'd be glad to listen since the actual one has no words that even come close to matching your claim of "find me 11k votes". If you could mention the minute mark of the recording, it would be appreciated as well, though not required.
I ask this of you because you stopped responding to my posts beliow when i linked the audio tape of the Ga election official/Trump phone call.
Here is what I listened to linked for your pleasure as well. It very much appears that you accused me of not listening to tha audio when you yourself had not actually done so. I'm listening.
Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TlUItuAxLjg
How about this one. Sounds like Trump to me spin this one. I’ll wait.
And by the way the two republicans lost and Georgia has two Democrat senators now for the first time in decades. Guess policy is screwed if Trump is unhappy. Huh?
You must be so proud of Trump. He’s vindictive. Cost the Republicans the senate majority. But you keep up your support.
Link: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=9Ie9u_0g15w
Ahh...two phone calls to diff GA election officials. Fair enough. To answer you .....
...it appears to have been an over an hour long call with Raffensberger. Trumps quote was importantly different from your claim that he said "I need you to find me another 11k votes".
His actual quote in the context of trying to convince the election official to investigate for voter fraud was "I want to find 11,780 votes". It's clear when you listen that he is frustrated about the various bizarre election occurences, and he is making the point that the election was very close and only separated by that margin of 11k votes and thus these local irregularities could make all of the difference. He states his hope (any recount /investigation is asked for by the losing side in hopes of making up the vote deficit upon investigation - in this case 11,780), but Trump didn't want the votes to be artifically manufactured as you claim. He wanted to see if proper authenticated votes would generate the votes he hoped for. He felt quite strongly that he was cheated. He laid out how every other state around Georgia showed a marked pro Trump trend, and in light of the shenanigans, he felt it was obvious that the vote validity should be investigated.
Since you hate Trump, you will presume his intentions to be bad here. I don't blame him for feeling cheated, or in asking for an investigation. I do acknowledge that you were not way off base since we were referring to different calls. I was wrong about that, and I'm sorry.
Tell yourself what ever you want to believe. Trump tried to pressure honest Republicans and also
threatened them. He lost get it. Or are you one of the Dead-Enders. And it was his fault. Are you happy he is running a dumbass football player in Georgia? Why because he is pissed his feelings were hurt. If that’s you candidate you deserve him.
The election was decided,& he should have backed off imo,but he has same rights as HRC and Algore.
(no message)
Trump may not be the only narcissist in our midst...here's the Associated Press' fact check of the
phone call between DJT and Brad Raffensberger...note that before the call took place, Georgia (which is controlled by Republicans) tabulated the votes THREE TIMES, and one of them was by a HAND COUNT...so, there were no spurious votes to find...Baron is doing what Trump does so well...making things up.
btw,..here is the entire call's audio recording...go to the 37:50 mark for the key request made by our treasonous President...
https://youtu.be/AW_Bdf_jGaA
P.S. Even Bill Barr declared the election valid.
P.P.S...like a narcissist, Baron has no shame and will NEVER admit he's wrong...just remember that.
Link: https://apnews.com/article/ap-fact-check-donald-trump-georgia-elections-atlanta-c23d10e5299e14daee6109885f7dafa9
And who would that be? Who is out there that you would consider a real leader? I don’t
Want Trump to run in ‘24. I would prefer DeSantis. But if it’s between Trump and the assholes running the country now, I’m voting Trump.
How can you support someone that is trying to destroy the Republican Party
Ask yourself why would he do that? He thinks it’s his party. Fuck him.
You said “we need to elect a real leader”. I asked you who that would be and you haven’t given
Me a single name. And yes, I would vote for Trump again if it’s between him and the dickheads we have now. You’re happy with Biden and would want another 7 years of this shit.
Give me someone who you think is a real leader.
So Trump is the only so-called Republican, former Democrat that you can vote for? That’s sad.
I don’t have a clue. I see no leadership in any aspect. But given the choice because Trump’s behavior that cost him the election I could never vote for that asshole again. I’m surprised you can.
And still no name from you. Give me who would be running that you would consider
A real leader. It’s not that hard of a question.
Nikki Haley how’s that? DeSantis my Governor won’t take Trump to the woodshed.
And while Nikki doesn’t take Trump on she checks all the boxes.
I would take Desantis. See, that wasn’t hard, was it. And he’s my Gov too.
I don’t know enough about Hailey to say one way or the other. Listen, if it’s Trump or Biden/Harris, it has to be Trump. Just like you said with Hillary.
We're all in full agreement actually. My additional criteria from PB is that it must be someone who
can actually win since the risk of more of this nonsene is too high.
If anyone gets hurt feelings over mean tweets. Probably should vote for someone gentler & kinder.
Someone that the Russians, Chinese, Iranians, and North Koreans all fear because he gets along with the DC elite of both parties. The more I see butt hurt feelings over mean tweets from DJT, the more I'm inclined to double down and vote for the guy. If a person isn't a DJT person, tell us what he didn't do to make the nation better. Make a case. Try and convince the rest of us. Insulting Trumpsters is not making a case. Squeamish over mean tweets is not making a case.