Is going soft on paedophilia a prelude to declaring it another "orientation?"
Slippery slopes do exist.
Replies to: Is going soft on paedophilia a prelude to declaring it another "orientation?"
If you're referring to Judge Jackson, you're headed down the 'slippery slope' of mis-information
leading to erroneous conclusions...you should go the YouTube and replay Sen. Hirono's comments regarding GOP accepted Judges to Circuit Courts who had records of sentencing "below guidelines" for child pornography offenders...whether you do or not, I'm going to post that link for everyone's benefit...
Link: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/21/us/politics/judge-jackson-child-sexual-abuse-fact-check.html
Yes, yes, everything you guys don't like is Russian disinformation.
...which should obviously be banned (as was the Hunter Biden laptop story).
We already know you guys don't like free speech.
Congratulations, Ned!...you haven't lost that talent for deflection...I won't ask you to stay on
track...that would be patently foolish of me..;-).
The same senator who told 8th grade girls their abortion rights were under attack.
(no message)
Is that not true?
btw...where is that video of Hunter Biden dropping off his laptop?...that would absolutely help clarify some serious concerns...please don't keep us hanging...I'm hoping and praying that you didn't just make up that statement.
You hope I didn't just make up what statement? The statement that Hirano made?
(no message)
Even newsweek is pushing articles about how everyone in the media lied about it being his laptop.
But you do you.. it's what you are best at.
Is that what the leftists are clinging to?
(no message)
Not sure what you mean...please explain...
(no message)
It’s Hunter’s laptop but he didn’t leave it there.
Like that is relevant at all.
Are we talking about this guy?
(no message)/cloudfront-ap-southeast-2.images.arcpublishing.com/nzme/RZHYD5WHSO6KKCWYJALEL2ZACY.jpg)
Not quite relevant to this thread, but not unexpected...on the HB laptop, go back and review
the links and comments I've already made...also, note that 51 Intelligence Community professionals still stand by their letter that this whole thing is part of a Kremlin disinformation scheme....plus it has Rudy Giuliani in a starring role ;-)...that should be enough to roll anyone's eyes...but, hey, knock yourself out on a non-issue that isn't going anywhere.
Are we talking about the guy who talked to his prostitute about the Russians having his laptop.
And how that might become a problem because his father was running for president, and because people will find out that he makes a "gazillion" dollars a year?...10% of which goes to Joe Biden himself?
Link: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9881213/Unearthed-video-shows-naked-Hunter-Biden-claiming-Russian-drug-dealers-stole-laptop.html
Again, not relevant to the thread topic...but I'll join you...can anyone verify that "the laptop"
was dropped off by Hunter Biden?...if not (default answer), then whatever is on that machine is questionable...even if it's a few emails...that may have been doctored to provide just the right amount of 'disinformation'...you do understand this "fine point", don't you?
It matters not whether it was HB's laptop, or someone else's...if it was held by others bent on creating a political advantage for Donald Trump (think "Rudy Giuliani"), then we have the potential for a "dirty trick"...it all starts with what I understand to be termed the "chain of custody", but perhaps you can shed some light on how that might be applied here...imagine yourself as an attorney representing Hunter Biden...and in the context of a Presidential election run-up...one where we already experienced an abuse of power by Donald Trump with his "Quid Pro Quo" attempt...again, with Rudy Giuliani (imagine that ;-))...
What are the odds, that Trump & Co. tried again??...
btw, with Biden's strong showing against Putin recently, we can understand why he didn't want to face someone with tons of experience and knowledge of him, Ukraine, etc....just like Putin, it appears to me that you and others on this board grossly underestimate Biden's ability to handle this crisis (crippling U.S. and "International" sanctions...solid NATO...alternatives to Russian oil & gas...etc.)
Emails have a sender and one or more recipients.
Devon Archer, Hunter's business partner, is "cooperating completely" with the investigation.
So, chain of custody doesn't matter if the emails can be verified to be authentic, which per reports they have.
According to what's been reported, it looks very bad for Hunter and possibly for Joe.
Ty will now attack that this was from the Daily Mail.
No attempt will be made to deny the facts noted in the article. It has to be bogus because it's about the Biden's.
Oh, it's from multiple sources. I just did a search to find a link about the video. It is out there.
(no message)
Then something else. Ty will deny it. No amount of proof is sufficient.
But if a dude claims to be a chick? He's all in!
Ha! Exactly.
(no message)
Hanging your hat on Clapper et al.? That's the basis for your confidence?
(no message)
Interesting how none of the prostitute photos come up on Google.
(no message)
How about taking a break from looking at nude photos and discussing the lack of evidence that
"the laptop" was actually dropped off by Hunter Biden...and all that entails...
Nice. This New York Times story you'll buy.
Consistency. Credibility. Integrity. That's what I like about you. If it's democrats involved, conspiracy, lies and misinformation. Republicans? Guilty as charged your honor!
That's a bit of a reach, Stark...no need to conflate two different threads.
(no message)
The sentiment remains. You'll give benefit of the doubt when your tribe is questioned.
The door most certainly doesn't swing the other way.
Paywalled, non-credible source.
(no message)
Those people don’t need to be sentenced, they need to be
Executed. Sexually abusing a minor is indefensible. That scum serves no purpose on this planet and should be shot right after being found guilty.
Already is in LGBQT circles. Called "minor attracted people".
(no message)