Anyone else wonder if the Russian nukes could hit anything they aim at?
Russian technology is hopelessly behind the times and they have a Potemkin military. Who knows if they can really deliver a decent first strike. At this point even Putin must wonder what nuke capacity he really has.
Replies to: Anyone else wonder if the Russian nukes could hit anything they aim at?
Horse shoes, hand grenades, and nukes.
(no message)
Don’t wonder. They don’t need to get close.
(no message)
Jesus. Their ability to conduct advanced precision strikes on critical defence infrastructure,
double digit Ukrainian airfields, C2 stations, S-300 anti-aircraft systems, radar stations... not impressed you? Or you just followed this war from propaganda? Maybe you should ask members of Ukraine foreign legion. They have the first hand personal experience and knowledge to tell you. A few of them are pretty active on social media.
Did I mention hypersonic missile? Russia has been working on scaling down their tactical nuclear weapons which is always their advantage, making them more practical.
They are pretty good at taking out civilian apartment buildings.
But, when you are shelling a city by the grid square, I guess you tend to hit everything after a while.
Yeah, I guess Ukraine fighters are smarter in positioning than stupid Russia weapons.
(no message)
When and where is the pep rally?
(no message)
Right here and everyday. I see propaganda-generated false sense of winning
(no message)
Holy sh*t, I will bring a case of Jameson and a tub of ice cream
(no message)
Now, now. I know you received briefings about those girls back in the day from the Marines.
I know the Army told us about them.
I know, I know and that's the problem, it was back in the day,....long time gone.:>)
(no message)
Still don’t know why “escalation”is our concern.
Congress should pass a Draft tomorrow. The United States should demonstrate that we welcome WW III.
Watch who blinks first.
Because the propaganda didn't make sense and got you confused.
(no message)
Because you are not very bright?
(no message)
Because I am not those stupid people who want to drag this country into WWIII
(no message)
Biden could have drawn some lines in the sand about nuke use, etc. He has declined.
NATO could pull a Kennedy, and announce that it will consider any detonation of any nuclear device by Russia to be a direct attack on a nation of NATO, thereby triggering Article 5. If you want to stop that, the Russian generals need to know what they will face if they obey any order like that.
NATO could also promise a no fly zone in response to a chemical attack.
Granted...Ukraine is already winning this war...but that is when Putin might get desperate.
After I posted that, I realized that Biden actually contemplated using nukes against US citizens.
Remember when he said US civilians didn't need rifles, because they would never be able to stand up to the US military which has nukes? Hmmm.
Biden is,and always has been a con douche bag of the highest order
(no message)
30yrs ago, I was told their bombs were much larger than ours because their missiles weren't accurate
Granted, it has been 30 years since Russia and the US has actually tested a nuclear weapon. Who can say about the reliability of those things. I guess they've been testing the delivery systems, though. (And before anyone says anything, a simulation is not a test...it is a simulation.)
This is correct. Soviet warheads were typically 2MT; ours, 660 KT
(no message)