Impartiality is a fundamental hallmark of any jurist. The appearance of any impropriety or conflict of this nature demands Justice Thomas to retire.
Link: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/03/24/virginia-thomas-mark-meadows-texts/
(no message)
(no message)
Look at last term’s decisions. Thomas sat on Brnovich v DNC, a voting rights case. Sat on numerous cases where the United States or a federal agency was a party.
Given his wife’s radical positions that the Biden Administration unlawfully assumed office, Thomas should retire. At a minimum, he should recuse himself from hearing voting rights cases or any case where the Executive Branch has submitted a brief.
Link: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/slipopinion/20#list
" In February 2021, when the Supreme Court rejected election challenges filed by Trump and his allies, Thomas wrote in a dissent that it was “baffling” and “inexplicable” that the majority had decided against hearing the cases because he believed the Supreme Court should provide states with guidance for future elections."
To my mind, this shows some degree of resonance with his wife...
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
I guess it's all I can expect from this board.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)