UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

Using Israeli data rather than our own because our data didn’t support what they wanted to do is unforgivable. They said “it wasn’t ready for a public roll out yet”.
They went against their own advisory panels last Sept and then reconstructed the panels with more malleable panelists who by definition were not as expert as their top choice panels. Further, they said that their recommendation for boosters in the young was based on data, but in fact the data with the largest numbers from the country involved did not support their recommendation.

There is starting to be a groundswell in the medical field that Fauci and Walensky can’t bully anymore. BidenHandlers want to give a 4th booster to everyone, but the most they will get will be a 4th booster to high risk individuals based on th data they released. They will try, but then back away and claim they agree when their effort fails.

The Biden Admin and Fauci et al have permanently damaged the trust in the government agencies. I do not recommend a 4th booster to the general, low risk and young population, and I’m proud to say that I didn’t recommend the first booster for low risk children despite all of the ignorant pseudo experts who think googling liberal slanted articles substitutes for expertise.
I also repeatedly called out the placebo nature of the homemade masks and improperly used, and reused masks (which is just about everyone who wears one). The “science” has proven this to be true as well.
The Biden Admins removal of the very benign Hydroxychloroquine from being used as an Off Label option back when there was no other option was unforgivable. The data was mixed on it for more than half a year and good treatment options weren’t available for a year. This is the equivalent of telling a cancer patient with no further options that they can’t try an experimental option. As long as the patient is given informed consent, and the medication is reasonably safe (which HCQ is despite the unethical claims by Some of the govt experts that it caused dangerous arrhythmias with significant frequency which was not true), it is the patient’s choice to make. Further, there was stronger evidence for using Hydroxychloroquine at the time than most of the experimental options offered off label. (I don’t expect the liberals here to understand the nuance of the Hydroxychloroquine off label issue, but I was right about that too irrespective of whether studies down the road found it effective or not).

(no message)

(no message)