Serious question for Ty, Jim and Conor
Are 100% of allegations or indications of Democrat criminal or unethical or immoral behavior always nothing? Because listening to you guys, it seems we're dealing with the first perfect human beings since Jesus Christ.
Replies to: Serious question for Ty, Jim and Conor
You should have asked them if they've ever avoided an easy but inconvenient question.
(no message)
Ditto...be specific...
(no message)
Re: Ditto...be specific...
I'm on record as acknowledging Donald Trump is a complete low-character jerk. PB says the same. MTG is a psycho nutjob.
The next time one of you three say anything negative about a Democrat will be a historic first.
Quite honestly, there is no one in the Democratic Party anywhere near as fundamentally despicable as
Donald Trump, or as mixed up as MTG, but I have stated on this board that Gov. Cuomo's behavior toward women justified his sanction by the Dem. party.
A. Weiner was roundly criticized and loathed by Libs,
AOC isn’t all that well backed here and her policies are a bit extreme, we have all agreed Bill Clinton wasn’t awesome so what is it you’re carping about?
Do you read what you post?
(no message)
I’m not sure what you’re asking.
(no message)
Are demos ever guilty of criminal or ethical behavior?
(no message)
More apropos would be, why do R’s protect and promote their criminals
when the D’s remove their shady characters. A. Weiner as an example for D’s and R.Moore as a R’s example.
We could always use the criminal DJT and his crime family being allowed to operate in the whitehouse with impunity for 4 yrs. but then I would be accused of being broken.
So no?
(no message)
The example of A.Weiner vs R. Moore wasn’t clear enough? Or
are you using 678’s reading lab skills for your posts these days?
So yes?
(no message)
Name the last Dem who was allowed to stay on after being convicted of wrongdoing?
(no message)
Not surprising.
(no message)