posts something that you can’t argue you don’t post. On both sides. My post below says everything. I posted actual words that Trump said and only the liberals responded.
Come on at least be yourself. Call balls and strikes. Is that too much for some of you?
(no message)
DFH is right, your need for attention is ridiculous.
(no message)
Fuck!!!
He absolutely refused to read Dr. Risch's paper on hydroxychloroquine and refuses to see the movie "2000 Mules." Perhaps the most close-minded individual on this board.
Got a good laugh at this line. What nerve!
explain why HCQ was ineffective...and in that effort I came across reports about Dr. Risch, such as the one linked here...from his own university. If they essentially deny his claims, why should I read that very same paper which more knowledgeable people than I have already read and discarded?
As for the "Mules" video, I told you that I viewed the trailer and will comment on it once an election fraud suit is filed, based on the movie's premise...IMO it would be 'close minded' of me to ignore the previous 60, or so, failed suits that have already been rejected...hence my statement to you.
If you have any other topics you want to bring up, I'll give you my thoughts on them as well.
btw, do yourself a favor and bookmark the link...refer to it whenever the name Dr. Risch comes up.
Link: https://yaledailynews.com/blog/2020/08/16/ysph-professor-criticized-for-promoting-unproven-drug-to-treat-covid-19/
I tried over and over to explain to you, as Dr. Risch did to others, why the "proof" you gave showing HCQ to be ineffective was not correct.
And I have never balked at seeing evidence that may counter my beliefs, but you have a strong history of refusing to even see evidence that might counter yours. "2000 Mules" has geotracking and video of these mules dumping numerous ballots into drop boxes. Now, it's entirely possible this was all above board and Dinesh and his crew got it all wrong, I'll grant you that. But without seeing the evidence the movie presents, we can't automatically say the movie is bogus, especially if it's claiming this alleged ballot dumping would not have been found by the way the investigations were conducted by the states.
support his claims...deal?
As for the other topic, your comment..."Now, it's entirely possible this was all above board and Dinesh and his crew got it all wrong, I'll grant you that."...is just what I was thinking...so, since there's no chance of me being able to discern truth from fiction at this point, why should I bother watching it?...IMO that's not being closed minded...rather, it's a more "efficient use of time"....tough decisions need to be made sometimes.
(no message)
He would not get it either, but at least he would try. Who's a good boy?
And uses studies that were in no way parallel to how HCQ was actually used to prevent death and hospitalization. Dr. Risch pointed this out in his paper.
sure to let us know when that happens.
as surely, they come without any substance at all about the subject at hand...I think there are internet words to describe such behavior.
(no message)
He's a strange cat.
(no message)
Poor grandkids. I hope they're safe.
Hate trump. A large majority of us want DeSantis and will only vote for Trump if there isn’t another option. We know you think he is Satan but you are in the same boat as Jim, Chris, Conor and Q412 in being obsessed with the guy. It’s almost unhealthy.
I would be very happy if he did not run. I think there are other candidates that have similar or better policies who won't cause the problems Trump causes.
But, he might run.
And, he is a formidable opponent. I think he will fluster many other GOP candidates like he did Jeb Bush, etc.
And, I think people now realize that voting for the nice guy is not a smart voting strategy, and they will vote based on policy.
But, I think other candidates can deliver better. He had his chance.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
I didn't know what you were talking about. I read some of the other posts, and I guessed that you were talking about Trump. But, why assume people listen to Trump? You and the liberals are hanging on his every word. I haven't heard him speak in a year, and I don't click on articles about him. If you want me to comment, then tell me what you are talking about. Don't make me google Trump. I have little interest in doing that. Conor and Jim are often very lazy, not letting me know what they are talking about. I ignore their posts all the time, because I have no desire to do research on a topic they can't bother to describe. I figure if they don't care enough to describe what is going on, then I will care even less.
(no message)
want everybody's 2 cents? would that be fare enough?
...when you aren't even willing to tell them what the topic is.
They just know that you don't care enough to describe it. So why should they care enough to google to figure out what you are talking about?
That is why I ignore most of conor's posts. If he doesn't care enough to say something about a topic, why should I care enough to read something about it and then comment?
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
….I vote based on policy.
Biden’s (Obama’s - let’s be real) policies are hurting this country….we are sliding fast.
I don’t want Trump again because I feel that I can get the policies without the doofus….and he’s too old as Biden has taught us all.
I want Ron DeSantis.
But if Trump wins, I will vote for the policies that he will enact, not how he will make me feel.
I don’t follow Trump, I never followed him on Twitter (that was mostly the Left who did ironically), and I’d be very, very happy if he didn’t run again.
But if he is the alternative to these radicals, I will vote for him 1000 out of 1000 times without even the slightest hesitation because I will know that it was best for my family, my country, and the world.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
concerned with policies than personalities. I do love that he does very well without being rehearsed.
anymore. He is an idiot and trying to destroy anyone who doesn’t kiss his ass.
(no message)