Including the pro-life psychos. And there are plenty.
Link: https://twitter.com/jskilesskinner/status/1523474849662144517?s=21&t=MTd3OgnUYrFgcqAou1fgpA
That never happened for the decades of Roe v. Wade.
If we had MAGA hat wearing people forcing justices into hiding, you would call it a threat to the republic, and you would be starting threads about it, but instead you are feebly responding to argue that your side is no worse than the other.
(no message)
You were pussies about all that, and now you are silent, which shows that your fears are only partisan, not for the Republic.
(no message)
(no message)
Chris is correct.
Only assholes intrude upon a public figure's private life -- their house, their family, their dining out a restaurant.
But, please get off your high horse.
Link: Gag us with your outrage, Baron
....they already firebombed a prolife office in Wisconsin. Biden may as well be lighting the fuse......no different than what you claim trump did. No different. Liberalism Rule #2.
There is no orchestrated effort to intimidate justices at their residences by the Administration.
Biden is a member of the bar. Civility and decency are basic tenants of its members.
These Chevy Chase nitwits demonstrating are busy buddies/drama queens with too much time on their on their hands, who want to make everything about them.
They have lost any semblance of basic respect and decency. It is dead wrong to demonstrate outside peoples' houses.
But, you are enabling the tension by hyping up imaginary battlefield lines. Set the example. Americans need to settle down and learn how to respectfully disagree with each other.
Exact same scenario.
1/6 is not equal in any way to protesters using their voice to be heard. I just don't think they should be
outside any of the Justice's homes doing it. (Well, with the exception being, Alito and Thomas - and oh maybe
Gorsuch, Barrett and Kavanaugh's homes - I kid)
I’m glad that you at least see the wrongness of going to the judges homes.
protesting and the jackass who gave out the addresses of the justices should find himself in legal hot water if it can be done.
FOX TV really isn't the way to go. They're the slick stuff in the sludge of a swamp.
Where is AG Merrick Garland? Why, he is apparently too busy hunting down parents of students who speak their mind at local school board meetings instead.
peaceful, there shouldn't be any.
btw, at least one neighbor of Kavanaugh has been protesting in front of Kavanaugh's house for months already...the White House did not direct anyone to the Justices' homes.
Link: https://www.wusa9.com/article/news/local/protests/pro-choice-protests-outside-the-homes-of-justices-roberts-and-kavanaugh/65-eebbc2e2-7593-4eaa-9992-f34383a6544f
(no message)
repeated testimony that he assaulted other women...imagine her outrage.
(no message)
1982 diary...and the words of three unrelated women...his "Choir Boy" pretense doesn't add up...btw, I went to a Jesuit H.S. as well, and know what even the best of the best can do.
guilty
should not be going 'ballistic' over a peaceful protest...which does not have to be silent. This kind of reporting reminds me of how "Aghast" they were over Obama wearing a 'Tan Suit" while President ;-) (...like Reagan did).
This potential reversal of a ruling that those justices referred to as being in the realm of "Stare Decisis" is absolutely grounds for them to exercise their First Amendment Right to "...assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."...there is nothing in the Constitution that says 'where' that peaceful protest can be held...and given the refusal of those Justices to clearly reveal their true intentions (re: Roe v. Wade) during confirmation hearings, they deserve to be protested against at their homes...they deceived the American people...including Senators who would not have confirmed them had they been truthful.
These people who are camped outside of Kavanaugh's house should go the fuck home.
(no message)
interest in objecting to the SCOTUS ruling and come fall it could injure a possible ground swell of D voters
wishing to deliver a message to the rest of the nation in a D tidal wave.
However, if one of those protesters is violent or causes harm or destruction, he should immediately redirect their
focus.
(no message)
You say the protestors should go home...great. But it is not you that matters, it is the POTUS. Biden has done EXACTLY the same thing that he accused Trump of doing. He gave an inflammatory speech immediately subsequent to the intentional SCOTUS leak.
He said that "these MAGA Republicans are the most radical group in American history.....then realizing his potential problem, he amended it to "recent history" - but recent history ncludes the BLM fire bombers, the No Justice,No Peace group, the CHAZ occupiers in Seattle, The Ruth Sent Us group, the ACORN radicals, the White Supremacists, The Neo Nazis, and NARAL. So his correction was no better than his initial assertion, and he fanned the flames.
Then his press secretary came out and said "protest peacefully" but would not discourage people from going to the justices homes - some of them with children - while they are in the process of doing the country's business of considering this active case.
Worse, Psaki (for Biden) has encouraged them to protest and intimidate the judges as they consider the case.
Joe Biden is guilty right now of everything that they acuuse Donald trump of doing on Jan 6. That cannot be dismissed with an idiotic term developed by hypocrites to defend their behavior. It is a fact.
Also, Biden's speech was atypically prepared and ready to go with political talking points and deceitful comments about the opinion. Biden said it would affect gay marriage, etc in that speech hours after the leak, yet 2 days later, he said that he hadn't read the opinion yet. Of course, he is too old and stupid to read the opinion or understand it, and his writers do it for him.....but they obviously knew ahead of time. this was a choreographed Democrat stunt - once again at the expences of the country.
I don't remember you guys complaining when Christine Blasey Ford had to move three times because she was being harassed and threatened at home.
See, genius? That implies that two wrongs make a right. I actually have a moral code.
And protesting outside the SCOTUS members houses is wrong.
(no message)
The people at her house were not encouraged by the White House.
(no message)
(no message)
No shrill cries that this is subverting the Republic.
(no message)