Pretty much sums up the board now, eh?
reached the level of wit it should if you're going to go after one another. It was a little tedious, not to say other threads left alone are any better.
So why not a little board cleaning every once in a while? It's a, so what.
It's just nothing to get hung about (to borrow a phrase).
I didn't see it as a personal attack on you or Tampa but by gum, you're swimming with the rats if you're trying to stoop to Tampa's level of wit.
That last line ought to get this thread cleaned.
:-)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
I didn't ask, but it was on the heels of me reminding Tyrone Conner that he supports grooming pre-schoolers with sexual material. You know, a reiteration of what he literally posted.
(And now here comes the snarky reply where he acts like the "adult in the room" and then locks out responses...3, 2, 1....)
I remember suspensions.
But I remember banter, too.
I had my share of "vacations," typically well-earned. So did others.
I actually don't mind the locking of threads that's more frequently done now. Some get tedious, some of my own included.
My problem now is the imbalanced suspensions and deletes, done usually in defense of a handful, along with the snarky personal element to it. I have no idea who he used to be before he got Board Op. status, but it was obviously some handle that had issues with several of us.
I have been suspended more in the last two years than in the other at least fifteen that I have been posting here. Suspensions then were only for when someone went completely off the rails. Now it’s on a whim.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
poster wanted to make life difficult. I have the sense that some do a lot of threatening to get their way.
I was canceled for 1 month for posting a fat chick here.
(no message)
(no message)