Liberalism in all of its glory.
None of this is to apply to themselves.
And pathetically, they accuse those others that they want to disadvantage permanently of being what they themselves are at heart…..racist.
how are they being unfairly apportioned?...all I'm hearing is a lot of vague, unfocused ranting...if there's a problem here, let's try to 'dissect' and understand it.
(no message)
Link: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/17/opinion/replacement-theory-us.html
It’s already tougher for young kids due to greater numbers of competitors, but you are glad to sign off on handicapping a whole segment of the population based on their genetic code(interestingly, the very one that you belong to) ias long as you get to keep yours.
Classic selfish liberalism. The rules apply to others (in this case those white males who have achieved greater merit), but not to yourself. You hypocrite.
(no message)
inequities with new counter inequities. In reality, that results simply results in more inequitiy which will perpetuate hatred and anger.
Chris likes to hide in semantics and definitions because he doesn't like facing the truth. Just because people aren't commonly being walked from their jobs and replaced dramatically and openly, he wants to pretend that it is a myth. But the inequity is now occurring in admsissions, and grad school applications, and job hiring. Many people even more qualified than Chris was when he was hired will now not have a shot at the job because of their genetics.
If white male liberals advocating this policy of inequity were truly sincere, they would offer their own positions first as a demonstration of their belief in the cause. But of course Liberalism Rule #2 is in effect : The rules are for thee, and not me.
(no message)
expensive shoes if they aren't in a cushy job?
...because they are used to it, and they don't think that would be fair. Liberals feel it is better to screw the young and never let them know what they missed.
(no message)
white males being able to get an equal shot at a spot.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Now, everyone on the left is outraged and an expert on this theory.
Your pal DJT time.
But even if all these years you've missed this conversation - defending replacement argument as a reason to go kill people is as insane as it sounds.
And then to justify it by saying black people kill black people too, so what's the problem, is on a whole other level of stupid.
The unions have though. No one even knew what this was because normal people don't talk like that. This is your knew talking point for the midterms. Yet another made up crisis. You wanna talk hate speech and a constant barrage of race discussion? Try CBS/NBC/ABC/NPR/CNN/MSNBC/WaPo/NYT/local news. Race and abortion is the left religion. Everything is a first for them. I'm betting that most on the left didn't know what this race theory was until they got the cue from the national media. What else was in that 'manifesto"? Did you read it all or just focus on selected parts of it? Who the hell says black people kill black people too? Find that exact quote from me. Black on black crime is real but your sheltered big time and have no idea the impact it makes on the families and communities. BTW, whatever happened to Darrell Brooks and his "writings"? Or you still blaming the SUV for the murders? The media kind of put that story in the back of the dresser drawer. So did you.
(no message)
That doesn’t count.
(no message)
Is anyone on the left and the media talking about those dudes? Anybody on the left talking about those incidents? What's the name of the hero Taiwanese doctor who was murdered by this Chinese church murderer? Media? Anybody? What's the name of the grocery store security guard hero that was murdered by a mentally disturbed psycho? Anybody from the media care? Did the media follow up with relentless reports digging into the background of Darrell Brooks or Frank James?
(no message)
(no message)