plus 3 reports. Wow, Mueller was really past his prime or seemingly so.
Russia?". (see link)...or this...
https://www.lawfareblog.com/steele-dossier-retrospective
Watching folks thrash about for some escape from their poor decision making engenders a lot of head shaking. Anyone who tries to bury the hundreds of Trump/Russia connections from scrutiny has to be questioned for not only their candor, but also their honesty.
Link: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/18/us/politics/senate-intelligence-russian-interference-report.html
(no message)
interviewed by Mueller's team, Durham's prosecution team nor by Michael Sussmann's defense team which, committed an unforced error putting him on the stand on Friday to testify on Mr. Sussmann's behalf after the judge had ruled against Durham's placing a Clinton e-moil in evidence. Now, the e-mail will come in as evidence for the prosecution. He testified on Friday that the 2016 Democratic presidential nominee agreed to provide information about a link between her opponent Donald Trump and Russian Alfa Bank to a reporter, despite the fact that her campaign was not certain about the truth of the allegations.
"Mook said the decision to release the Alfa allegations to a reporter was discussed with senior campaign officials, including senior policy adviser and now the White House national security adviser, Jake Sullivan; campaign chairman John Podesta and communications director Jennifer Palmieri.
Clinton was briefed about the decision to go to the press with the allegations in the fall of 2016, and according to Mook, 'she thought we made the right decision.'"
Sort of reminds me of Tyrone Power, Marlene Dietrick and Charles Laughton in "Witness for the Prosecution," written by Agatha Christie
Link: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/hillary-clinton-durham-investigation-robby-mook/
Michael Sussmann in ANY WAY change the fact that Donald Trump and his campaign operatives worked together with the Russians on the 2016 election?
The contents of my previous post, as I'm sure you know, provides the material for a much bigger "HIT" than Durham's production...a GOP-led panel concluded, as did Mueller that there was "inappropriate contact", to coin a phrase.
What it all comes down to, is Donald Trump was/is in bed with Putin...need I expand on what that means for the U.S....including those are on the front lines defending us against an aggressor like Vlad?
to rebut Mr. Mook's trial testimony given under oath, admitted as direct evidence by the judge without objection by the defense...
If you are going to look for a link, it will of necessity have to take the trial testimony of Mr. Mook into account as the judge has deemed his testimony admissible for the jury to consider in reaching a verdict.
If you know of something out there I would enjoy reading such document or testimony given under oath.
(no message)
piece of partisan fiction is beyond me.
feebleness out in the open for no gain.
(no message)
Wrong and it’s all Trumps fault.