Thank God for Joe Biden and the Democrats.
LAURA INGRAHAM: "I want to be very, very clear tonight. President Biden appeared on camera tonight for less than eight minutes, not because he believed that his words would comfort the families or the friends of the victims. Not because he believed that he would calm what are obviously frayed nerves of a worried nation, parents who were worried and he didn't do it to unite America in this time of grief. No, he did not. He spoke tonight because politics is selfish, because in today's twisted world, it's considered perfectly appropriate to exploit the massacre of innocent, little kids in order to try to turn around your own sagging poll numbers. Today, Reuters-Ipsos has Biden at the lowest approval of his presidency, 36%. So this attempt at political resuscitation on Biden's part — it's despicable. But it's altogether predictable, isn't it? The White House has tried this many times before, and it's failed. Any politicians, I don't care if you're Republican, Democrat or somewhere in between, and you're seeking to use what happened today to help yourself — you should be ashamed of yourself. We have a political process in our country. If you want to change the law, if you want to change the Constitution, go ahead and get the votes and change the law or amend the Constitution. If you can do that, you will find success in whatever your goals are. But if you can't do that, don't come to the nation at a time of tragedy and try to shame the rest of us, because we know what time it is. We know what's really going on."
Aside from your opportunism, the real elephant in the room is that this is another prime example of the breakdown of the nuclear family. No father in the picture, the 18 year old kid had to go live with his grandmother because he couldn't get along with his mom. The kid has serious issues and regardless of your feelings about guns, he was going to kill somebody with something. The question you opportunists can never answer is what laws could have been in place that would have prevented this from happening? And, if you say making assault rifles illegal or large capacity magazines illegal, how does that really work? There are 20+ million of them that are known already across the country, do you think someone can just gather them all up? That doesn't take into account what comes across the open southern border illegally and we have no idea how many of those there are.
…because their little bodies have been blown apart beyond recognition.
There is no evidence that anything the left has offered to prevent this would actually work. It's just words and politics.
…the most likely access point for illegal guns is our unenforced border, but conor mentions nothing about this.
Maybe it was legally obtained too, but conor presumes only this possibility because it fits his political viewpoint, and this event takes our eyes off of the Misery Index.
Real gun control would have to include laws against legal guns that he wants AND illegal guns which he ignores. This tells us that conor is actually only about the politics here rather than the issue. And he’s willing to use the deaths of children to make it before the facts are even fully available.
how lucky we are to have Joe.
not banning rifles.
Carry on.