I mean, if an illegal can get away with lilling someone's daughter... and the justice system deliberately looks the other way....
But the issue is... would a progressive DA also be superlienent with someone merely for seeking revenge?
If they say they do, then we just have to understand that they are redefining the term (As they often do) of fair justice to mean that their constituents are punished less because they think that is fair. But, it is not objective fairness.
And, they want every government agency to adopt their new standards of unfairness. They seek systemic unfairness. That is a recipe for disaster.
They know they will selectively enforce any new gun laws, as with the existing laws. They will try to disarm suburbia first. Who cares about Chicago criminals? Who cares about illegal immigrant criminals? Not them.
Having said all that, you would rather be tried by 12 than carried by 6. I wouldn't do any vigilantism, but self-defense is going to become far more important. You can't rely on the police.
Go and get them, and put harsh draconian gun laws on the books. Commit a crime with a gun, life without parole. Close gun show loophole. Caught with a gun without proper papers, life in prison. Enforce the fucking laws. Your point is correct, they want to take guns from law abiding citizens. Fuck that noise, just enforce gun laws on the books and on top of that make gun crime severe. Black yute gangbanger, sorry life. Suburban dad, who had an unregistered gun, sorry....Make examples and both sides could be happy.
(no message)