(no message)
effort to learn...I guess it frees your mind to pen such nonsense...so, just to give you a start...ponder the implications of this chart...note that all the recent Ice Ages...and retreats...occurred within the 180-300 ppm band...we're at 416 ppm and CLIMBING every year, with no chance of stopping w/o ending the burning of Fossil Fuels...
Be the science based person you purport to be...
Everyone is now feeling.
humankind moving forward?
Also been consistent in saying that if there is indeed human caused climate change we should be spending time and money learning to live with it not trying to stop it. the earth is a big place and the USA and Europe can’t be the only countries who reduce emissions.
You need to get off that fence and made a decision...the data in that chart is as accurate as is humanly possible...especially the most recent measurements which literally no one disputes. We are headed deeper and deeper into an environmental regime that this planet hasn't seen for 800,000 years...numerous Ice Ages came and went when CO2 concentrations varied from 180 - 300 ppm...we're climbing through the 416 ppm mark with no end in sight...in a relative 'millisecond' historically.
As I've also mentioned, our Fossil Fuels are vital for all sorts of uses beyond just burning them for heat and power...yet they are truly "Finite" and will not last for hundreds of years. We have alternatives now...we need to transition in earnest to Nuclear Power and Renewables...ASAP...and acknowledge that the process will take a couple of decades, at best, to complete.
For those anxious to get to the crux of the matter...these are the final comments (but do yourself a favor and read the whole article)..
-------------------
What's the fix?
The best things governments can do, says Donovan, is nothing. "In as much as governments really can't change the oil price, central bankers can't suddenly change the price of wheat and other commodities."
Part of the pricing inflation story is already naturally coming down, and other factors like the impact of the Ukraine war on food and fuel prices are beyond the scope of influence from most governments, he adds.
However, it's a different question when it comes to whether government should try and mitigate the consequences of higher inflation. "There, there are things they can do. They can either look at benefits that are being paid to try and help people for higher prices, or where something is being taxed."
Oil, for example, is often taxed, so some governments may feel they could temporarily lower the tax on it, or reduce sales taxes on other products to try and make life a little bit more affordable. So there are things that governments can do to mitigate the impact in the cost of living in the short term, even if they can't change oil supply and demand.
"If we're talking over the next 10 years, then yes, of course governments can encourage investment in renewable energy and so on. But in the short term, there is a limit to what governments can do to offset price increases."
-------------------
This is a global problem...added to another problem...i.e., Climate Change...which sooner or later a 'Critical Mass' of this planet's people need to understand and join together on implementing solutions.
Link: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2022/05/inflation-rising-economist-explains/
(no message)
(no message)
By a professor. An actual goshdarn professor.
(no message)
That's the key point in all this.
Walk back his comments. The real question is will he do it before the White House?
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Otherwise but a guy who thinks he knows everything keeps saying it,
(no message)
Along with open borders, defunded police, sexual perversion tolerance, higher regulations and taxes, appeasing Iran and censorship on the internet. Did I forget something on the Progressive agenda list?
He called it first, goddammit.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)