New, blockbuster, walls closing in evidence……..again, this time for real, 24th time is the charm?
Or is it bad ratings and a chance for a graceful exit while their base is preoccupied (no one else is watching so they done need a distraction for them).
the question shifts to "Should" he. While Ford's pardon of Nixon often comes up, back then there was John Dean's testimony and audio tapes...plus enough GOP Senators who had seen enough and would vote for Impeachment, so the issue was resolved w/o going through a trial over a bungled and covered up political Ops Research effort...no inherent threat intended to our democracy.
This time, IMO it's a very much different ball game...the intent was to trash democracy for the sole purpose of allowing malignant narcissist to remain in power...that kind of behavior by Trump...and his supporting cast...must be crushed so that it never, ever, comes close to happening again...therefore, DJT not only "Should" be indicted, but MUST be.
While Trump looks at TV ratings, the Committee is focused on a much smaller audience.
Link: https://time.com/6189307/donald-trump-federal-charges-for-jan-6/
(no message)
…or did they need time for production?
Btw, given the continual treasonous leaks against Trump by Deep Staters, only an idiot would give them more opportunity. You gave Trump no other choice to talk privately. But Trump’s record as POTUS againstRussia is quite clear, while your guy’s actions are far more questionable.
I noticed that you have dodged the Biden backing of NORDSTREAM 2 at all attempts to engage. This action even works against the Climate Change excuse he used to shut down our own Keystone pipeline.
Care to give your soon on Biden’s NORDSTREAM policy decision which reversed Trumps policy, and gave Putin the EU oil advantage while crippling ourselves? Is Biden a Russian agent. In your eyes too?
(no message)
Bort Shon. Guns, climate, trans etc, all go the back of the bus. Watch how quickly all the midterm messaging pivots.
(no message)
(no message)