(no message)
will try. The issue is capital. No oil company or infrastructure company (pipeline or terminals) are willing to risk capital. Also it’s hard to raise capital because fossil fuels are evil. But on the margins it will be beneficial to make the US energy sector sound again. There might be some thought with Canada to restart Keystone. And possibly export terminals in the US Gulf to build more LNG terminals to Europe and around the globe. Reduce our export deficit. But it’s a plus for US energy independence.
(no message)
The legal reasoning calls the executive branch’s ability to regulate industry into question.
It is potentially enormous.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
And good news for attorneys challenging defunct regulations
So much of the majority decision was about the issue of ripeness, and not the merits.
Not a single mention of Chevron/Mead by the majority?
I had hoped for more clarity on a test for when the major questions doctrine applies, but I didn’t see it on my first read through it? Left me wanting more.
clean energy. This should put some limits on the dreamers.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)