Replies to: Secret Service Chief is leaving his post July 30.
What conspiracy theory are you pimping now?
(no message)
Did anyone say anything about a conspiracy other than you? Nope!
Then There probably isn’t one.
However, if you had been paying attention you might know of the 1/6 hearings and a claim made about a week ago involving 2 SS agents on a DJT detail headed to the West Wing.
Maybe not, you’re not an avid fan of news.
But you are a big fan of knee jerk reactions.
I should have known, 1/6 is behind your thinking. I just hope you have the same care about 6/16.
Do you guys have anymore blurry pictures or videos of Trump "grabbing the wheel" and overpowering SS agents. I really enjoyed the others.
Hey, read the article. It’s a point of interest. You don’t like it, too bad.
There is no conspiracy, as I said.
I also noted before i didn’t think they would risk exposing themselves (meaning the Secret Service) for this meaningless moment by testifying in the open hearings. This gives him a viable out with his guys.
Timing is everything.
But you need to take things far beyond what was posted. As usual.
I'll pass. Just more of your 1/6 garbage, as usual.
(no message)
No guppy, you’re just being ridiculously outraged again. Typical.
(no message)
Just in time for what?
He’s going to work for Snapchat in California.
We will see.
(no message)
See what? What will resigning and moving to California insulate him from exactly?
(no message)
Insulate?
(no message)
Yes. Again, What is it YOU believe is the reason for the timing of his resignation?
(no message)
I think you’re insisting there’s a conspiracy in this.
I merely noted - just in time.
I could have said, saved by the bell. Or, good for him.
I'm not insisting anything, I'm asking you what on earth you think resigning would "save" him from?
(no message)
Whatever you want it to mean. You read the post before
typing in “saved”? Yes?
OK. Given your inability to clarify, it means your post makes zero sense. Thanks.
(no message)
I didn’t take you for such a Drama Queen. Oh well.
(no message)
Retreating to the land of make believe because you don't understand what you posted?
Didn't see that coming.
Wasted too much time trying to actually entertain whatever you thought you were on about. Clear that you hadn't a clue...
I feel badly you took it way too far. It was a simple post and you and others thought there was this
big message being posted like playing the Beatles albums backward. No, it was what it was.
Jim plays coy by repeating one word questions when he’s cornered.
Which is often.
You, Gup tttk and rage are taking this way too hard.
Read the article. That should be the end of it.
I certainly didn’t expect it to be so outrageous.
We are just trying to get to the bottom of your "Just in Time" comment. Help us understand
what YOU meant when you typed that out? There is no outrage here, we're just curious as to what YOU meant.
Would you want to testify in front of the open 1/6 hearings
if you didn’t need to? And neither would I
“Just in time”.
You grappled with that way too long.
If you read the article, you would have agreed instead of the circle jerk you were in on.
Was that so hard? Your theory is that this guy is running to get away from the Made for TV
Committee? That he has something to hide because he is protecting his 2 agents that Trump overpowered? Is that why you think he is taking the job in California and the "just in time" comment?
No, that was your theory of what I typed in for the article not mine.
(no message)
Indeed. Jim has a number of "tells". Guessing he doesn't play a lot of poker.
(no message)
From his answer to me, which is shocking, he is trying to say the Chief is hiding from the 1/6
incident where Jack Reacher, I mean Trump, tried to overpower 2 armed SS agents to take over a vehicle. I guess the move of the Chief shows just how guilty he is that he would purposely move to California for a new job. It's all a bombshell waiting to explode, again!