(no message)
All Republicans are scum.
(no message)
Their massive legislative efforts (post 2020) are all designed to (1) surgically suppress minority votes and (2) fix the count.
Moreover, they intimidated, threatened and harassed seasoned and honest election workers to leave their posts, so they could insert their own unscrupulous plants.
Scum indeed.
(no message)
But, the Senate Republicans refused to set national standards …. because they know that they lose on a fair playing field.
They prefer to let GOP controlled legislatures cook the outcome via voter suppression and fixed vote counts. Your America.
Link: https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/senate-bill/2747
loopholes that allow almost anyone to vote. in toher words, the perfect opportunity for the Democrat ballot harvesting system that Joe Biden bragged about in 2020 which was used during COVID.
Do you think we are stupid?
(no message)
Only for it to be the most secure 4 years later. Weird how that happened.
(no message)
But, if anyone has shown amazing insight on this forum, it is nocalirish.
Either they will subvert it, or they will claim it is illegitimate.
Pretty much every one of them just assumed that the article said something they wanted it to say and the attacked.
I think it was Stalin who said that the important factor is not who votes but who counts the votes. And that is the threat for 2024.
If whatever is said at the link is not worth his time to comment upon, why would I think it would be worth my time to read?
If he has something to say to us, I figure he will say it. But, he rarely has anything to say. If he does happen to say something, I will read a link.
dead and because of ballet harvesting. or like they do in Ca. just give illegals the right have divers licenses and not put it the license. .
That's how Kennedy done it. . remember ...
Period.
"the U.S. Supreme Court does not hesitate to affirm the notion. In the 1972 decision in Dunn v. Blumstein, Justice Marshall stated, “In decision after decision, this Court has made clear that a citizen has a constitutionally protected right to participate in elections on an equal basis with other citizens in the jurisdiction.” And again in the 1974 Richardson v. Ramirez case, Justice Rehnquist wrote: “Because the right to vote ‘is of the essence of a democratic society, and any restrictions on that right strike at the heart of representative government,’… voting is a ‘fundamental’ right.”
PS: go back to your, Russia and to your buddy, Putin.
(no message)
Link: https://www.vox.com/platform/amp/2014/10/20/6997315/voting-rights-amendment-affirmative-right-to-vote
(no message)
Not surprising you'd laud the sleazeball known for magically finding leftist votes after elections.
Lots of credibility here.
And if someone is truly dumb enough not to be able to figure out how to vote, we're better off that they are not voting.
And let me tell you, the reason for mask wearing is a whole lot easier than figuring out where ones voting precinct
is and where it was moved to and now how to get to that precinct.
You shouldn't go throwing stones in that direction until you at least figure out mask wearing.
(no message)
(no message)
Even more so, understand what he’s saying.
(no message)
n.d. only allows admission to illiterate deplorables.
that has to be the reason you didn't make the cut.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
And I would love to hear your explanation for why.
don't you agree that only legal citizens should have the right to vote?
the problem, however, is the libdems are trying (again) to cheat by allowing non-citizens to vote. you can do this by not requiring proof of citizenship (which is easier to get than justice for victims of crime in blue areas) and by not allowing mail-in fraudulent votes from, oh, just anybody. or copy machines. you know... the 2000 mule train. what do you think the open border policy is all about? if you guessed packing voters into red districts, you'd be correct for a change.
that's how you insure the right to vote for the legal citizenry - government issued i.d's.
(no message)
all i see is a citizen. period. race, creed, color, and all the other "unifying" characteristics you libs want to use to separate us are not material.
citizens look like citizens.
period.
(no message)
In contrast, the thought of discounting a lawfully cast ballot because the vote counters in a politically biased state are cooking the count, should shock your conscience, assuming you are the American you espouse.
But, you failed to comprehend the article, authored by Marc Elias — one of our nation’s foremost defenders of our democracy.
i certainly never alleged or implied anything except that all votes cast by legal citizens should be counted.
i'm a firm believer in the illegality of your "discounting a lawfully cast ballot because the vote counters in a politically biased state are cooking the count" statement.
that's precisely why i clearly said there should be vote counting oversight by all interested parties. how difficult is that for you to "comprehend"?
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Imagine flagging a precinct that votes 80% Republican, and fabricating an allegation of voter fraud, and therefore not counting that precinct’s votes.
And then reporting a statewide count excluding all the votes cast in that precinct.
Sound fair?
it should be done manually with all interested parties present. machines can be rigged too easily. even i can program a computer to discount or reassign votes. too easy.
there are millions of fraudulent votes as said by Republicans (not democrats). So, before this suddenly, there was no need for new states
laws giving the Governor and others oversight to disqualify votes just because of what appears to be, faux suspicion of illegal votes.
Example - Pennsylvania was said to have been infested with gazillions of fraudulent votes - there were 5 and they were by Republicans.
(no message)