Based on a single FBI source. The only thing more reliable than FBI sources is an FBI source. Take it to the bank, as we saw over the past few years. Well done, news sources of record!
Odd, isn't it, that all these retractions we commonly see these days seem to be ones that paint a negative view of one side. What are the odds?
Link: https://www.foxnews.com/media/new-york-times-washington-post-nbc-news-corrections-giuliani-fbi-russia-warning
.......it turns out that the liberals have known about persistent racism because of inside information.....on themselves!
And the bias of the WaPo as well as the spin of their “fact-checkers” is on full display.
Link: https://www.foxnews.com/media/npr-wapo-glenn-kessler-defend-tim-scott-piece
(no message)
"We're at a turning point! This time, we got 'im!"
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
News organizations make mistakes. The good ones admit it and correct them.
(no message)
building something like this off of a single source is not good journalism.
Then again, how many smart people go into journalism these days?
(no message)
(no message)
initially implicated Biden and Associates.
(no message)
Fair and balanced.
There will be more as time goes on - because the media covers the president the most, and will therefore get more stories wrong about the president.
It's not necessarily evidence of bias. Sorry.
Link: https://www.cnn.com/2021/04/26/politics/fox-john-roberts-red-meat-biden/index.html
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
makes it even more difficult - so you're right, they could commit to many reports of media dispensing wrong and misleading information
produced daily.
The difference between news outlets like WaPo, NYTimes and FOX TV, Sinclair TV is - WaPo and the NYTimes don't
intentionally promote wrong and misleading information for their followers where FOX TV, Sinclair TV, do.
The other issue with FOX TV, Sinclair TV and places like that, they intentionally don't retract their incorrect news stories unless forced to.
Places like that hail the producers of the shows with promotions - WaPo, NYTimes usually fire those who get big stories wrong
or at least demote those who can't get their info correct first time. Lets look at Dan Rather.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)