UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

(no message)

(no message)

us about all the killers and then tell us about the Capitol building and tell us about the Proud Boys demonstrations and QAnon and all the other
militant groups you champion.

Were communities and cities shut down like the D / BLM riots shut down neighborhoods forever? And what about the attack on the Portland police station by D/BLM rioters? I can play this tit for tat game all day. You open your big mouth, safely from your little hide away, where none of this affects you.

(no message)

(no message)

People are smart enough to tell the obvious differences.

I will repeat again how unbelievable it is that the Dems have become the party that tells the people to trust the freaking FBI and CIA and intelligence community. Unreal, that flip, and all because those entities have been weaponized against Lucifer incarnate, Donald J. Trump. You'd have to be historically illiterate to trust the FBI and CIA, given all the chicanery and deception and immoral activities those agencies have perpetrated for many decades. I used to have most on the left with me on this, but, you know, Trump happened, so those sorts of principles, along with free speech/expression went out the window.

(no message)

(no message)

(no message)

She has integrity and sacrificed her career. Not that being a politician should be a career but she did it.

(no message)

(no message)

(no message)

(no message)

Lock him up.

(no message)

Lock him up.

(no message)

(no message)

(no message)

On top of that, he’s a freaking war hero. The guy is exactly what the Republican Party needs.

It appears that Dan doesn't dig the R rank and file voicing their opinions. It also is apparent that if a R has an opinion that that differs with DJT, that R becomes the darling of the left until they are done with that person.

His opinion doesn’t matter. Crenshaw is a man of action who makes a difference in his constituents lives. What he says matters and he leads by example.

Now, I’ll get you saying he is a war hero. I guess he gets that title for losing an eye in battle. He is more of a Patriot than anyone who hasn’t served. The word Patriot now has lost any real meaning since it is thrown around on politicians strictly based on their hatred for Trump.

But I’m really curious to see what good ol Dan has done to make his area of Texas better.

I’d say he represents his constituents very well.

Link: https://www.congress.gov/member/dan-crenshaw/C001120

Ukraine and sooner or later, we need to get them off the US's tit. That money can be used at home instead of overseas.

If we let the Ukraine fall, that would mean a victory for Putin. He’s the enemy. It’s too bad you and others don’t see this. Oh, and the money used to support the Ukraine doesn’t take away from the Fed’s hapless domestic spend.

Handle him. I see him as the enemy but don’t support keeping the Ukraine on the US’s tit. You guys continue to think we are supporting Putin because we don’t want to continue sending Zelensky money and free weapons. You’ll never change my mind and I won’t change yours on this.

I do enjoy seeing politicians and movie stars walking around the Ukraine that is supposed to be a war zone. Do you have your Zelensky action figure sitting on your desk so you can stroke it?

and no, I don’t think we should jump in with troops unless he attacks a NATO country.

I’m all for proxy wars if possible.

his country is being destroyed and then he tries to guilt-trip us into believing that we aren't sending him enough money. He's a self-serving ingrate, but no one has the guts to tell him to shut up and pound sand when he acts like a spoiled child.

(no message)

(no message)

And I doubt there is anyone here who sees Putin as anything other than a murderous autocrat. Are all murderous autocrats/theocrats our enemies? If so, which ones should we devote our time, lives, and money to defeating?

fallen by now.

Putin is the immediate threat. Ask anyone that you know in Eastern Europe. The guy wants to re-establish the old Soviet Union. Unfortunately for him, he fucked around and found out that the Ukrainian people are willing to fight and possibly die for their homeland. It would be the same in Poland and other neighboring countries.

Our foreign interventionist community depends upon nebulous terms and hazy measuring sticks.

(no message)

(no message)

Most of the bills that include his name were introduced by someone else and he is merely a co-sponsor, along with 100+ other members of Congress. Looking at the last year and a half, only one has passed the House and most of the rest have died in committee. Probably a better way to measure how well he serves his constituents, seeing that he represents a district in Texas, is what he has voted against.

I look at the list you linked and right near the top, I see a bill that would create a new "lend-lease" arrangement with Taiwan. I doubt most of his constituents think we should be sending millions to Taiwan at this time, and also raising tensions with China, as we are doing with Ukraine and Russia. It's the sort of move that wins plaudits in the media and in DC but generally isn't popular with the people these days.

Maybe getting re-elected? That, in my humble opinion, would be the ultimate measure, yes? If not…let me know.

For a member of the House, I think it's simple: does he/she enact policies that benefit or protect most of his constituents most of the time.

(no message)

People are reelected for all sorts of reasons. One of the biggest reasons is simply name recognition. It happens at all levels of government, actually.

I don’t know the answer, but when I vote, I research every single bill and candidate.

He'd be eaten alive if he went on Tucker.

(no message)

on that thar tellervision?

(no message)

intellect. He certainly comes off as approachable and normal.

(no message)

(no message)

(no message)

We have a number of posters that are successful in life. You measure success by $$$. That’s OK. I do too in some ways, but there are better ways.

It happens that Tucker and some posters here don't agree. That's why you resent the guy. Tucker's stance on Ukraine. He is paid to do exactly what he is doing, whether you like it or not. Dan Crenshaw is wrong on Ukraine. He's not the only one. We all have the right to voice our opinion, but apparently, Congress isn't listening.

“Tucker is right and Dan is wrong, but we all have the right to state our opinion”.

It perplexes me that you, Eli and the rest of the Putin lovers side with an ex-KGB piece of trash. My hope is that our support will break Russia, just like we did when the wall came crumbling down. I used to like Tucker and Hannity, but they’ve lost their minds when Trump got stomped. To each his own…I guess.

Who's keeping track of the money being sent to Ukraine? You? Dan? Ben Stiller? Who's keeping track of all the weapons the United States have sent? You? Dan? Love these message board warriors thinking that war is just another video game. Why isn't anyone (including Dan and Mitch) interested in responsibility for the money and weapons we have sent? Tucker isn't your problem.

That’s quite the assumption. You also assume that people who support the Ukraine don’t care what happens around our southern border.

Assume all you want, but the fact is that you, Eli, and Tucker are groveling fools when it comes to foreign policy and most other things. Fuck off

Show me where every cent is going and the location of every weapon we have sent. Better yet, maybe Dan will do it. The lives lost, the people left behind, the weaponry gift wrapped to the Taliban is still a fresh memory. Why would this time be any different?

assumptions are facts. You nor I know what’s being accounted for, so stop with the bullshit. While you’re at it, remove Trump’s balls from your mouth. It might provide you with a little clarity.

(no message)