easier to get a scotus ruling early than an unredacted affidavit
(no message)
Replies to: easier to get a scotus ruling early than an unredacted affidavit
What more is it you need to know at this time?
“preliminary triage of the documents with classification markings revealed the following approximate numbers: 184 unique documents bearing classification markings, including 67 documents marked as CONFIDENTIAL, 92 documents marked as SECRET, and 25 documents marked as TOP SECRET," according to the affidavit.”
——————————-
Do you really think that in knowing this much from the open portion of the affidavit that maybe the redacted portion of the affidavit will exonerate and absolve DJT?
Oh it has to be important - top secret is spelled out in caps. It's really important that happens.
(no message)
Don’t deflect - what more do need to know?
Do you need to actually see the top secret classified documents?
I didn’t say I needed anything else. I’m still digesting your
Invented story about him selling stuff.
We need proof that this wasn’t a Dem engineered raid by the FBI of the former POTUS.
We know:
1)The FBI already altered a FISA warrant application against Trump’s team to spy on him in the past.
2) No former POTUS has ever been raided in his home
3) Trump can declassify the info at will and says that he did
4) If there were nuclear secrets (and why on earth would there be?) as FBI leaked to press or some other critical info that threatened our national defense that Trump couldn’t declassify and wasn’t adequately protected, why did they wait a year and a half to get it back? Esp since they clearly knew what was missing from the start and were requesting from Trump who did comply by their admission.
Further, released affidavit reveals no suggestion of such info.
5) Obama/Biden has already weaponized other agencies against their political opponents: IRS - see Lois Lerner,
FBI - see Strzok, McCabe, Comey, NIH - see Fauci.
6) DOJ specifically held off on Hunter Biden/Joe Biden Gratf Scandal and laptop investigation until after midterm elections because they “didn’t want it to influence the elections”. But they had no such concern about doing the same for Republicans.
We need proof that the DOJ isn’t lying again.
At this time before the Fall elections? Why, I can’t imagine wanting this clarified.
(no message)