Ooops! It appears there were documents related to nuclear US secrets.
What say you now?
Replies to: Ooops! It appears there were documents related to nuclear US secrets.
Named sources or anonymous again?
(no message)
Were there?
(no message)
I guess it depends upon which side of Witch Hunt you’re on - the side of facts
and truth or the side of ridiculous and obsequious!
Factual side knows DJT has illegally spirited away top secret and classified documents to his residence in Florida - the ridiculous side sees those documents as his personal items that he declassified by boxing them for home.
The factual side believes in law and order where the MAGA side sees a conspiracy and hate.
Yet Biden is still a shiftier president than Trump. Truly amazing!
(no message)
“Biden is shiftier than Trump.” Possibly, however #45 is the criminal and has always been one.
“I could shoot somebody and I wouldn’t lose voters”, Trump in Helsinki, Trump with Ukraine extortion, Trump coup attempt, Trump trying to steal 2020 election, Trump University, Trump charities as slush funds - and everything in between. And now, Trump stealing US top secret documents.
You missed your mark.
Biden certainly is a name caller like Trump. I thought he was supposed to be different.
(no message)
A name caller?
(no message)
Then let justice play out. Focus on the current threat (Joe) rather than fixating on the past.
(no message)
Are you insisting DJT isn’t s major force in today’s politics as the probable R candidate?
Are you insisting his theft of government secrets isn’t a major influence on today’s voting block?
Are you insisting trump and his hackery have allowed justice to play out after the theft of government secrets, as in the FBI framed him therefore his innocence has been impaired and the likes of me are condemning him unfairly?
Are you insisting that “nothing burger” crime and subsequent favored ruling don’t deserve everyone’s attention?
I’m saying Joe Biden is a bigger threat to America and American values than Trump ever was.
(no message)
Tommyrot!
(no message)
Based on precedent, no reasonable prosecutor would prosecute. Or, would you overfule precedent?
(no message)
Precedent is a big reason why Trump would be prosecuted.
Obstruction would be the other reason.
Time will tell. I do not presume to know the scope of the evidence, but I do know what would happen to Sgt. Aslam if he kept top secret documents in his apartment.
We understand that there are two sets of laws in your America.
Link: “Precedent”
I would assume it would be the same punishment as Hillary and Comey.
(no message)
Well, “Skip to my Lou…”!
(no message)
“Precedent”? What precedent?
(no message)
It says of other countries. Not related to the US. Did you have a different link ftomTy?
(no message)
It’s odd, no one said anything about nuclear codes and yet
you and your pals here post about them.
And yes it is US secrets involving nuclear technology.
I’m not sure why this Top Secret US information has to be US nuclear weapons or codes for you to understand TOP SECRET DOCUMENTS ( for emphasis) were stolen by Trump for his personal use.
Are you really that stupid?
You can’t see why we wouldn’t want other counties to know what we know about their nuclear programs?
Really?
So, NOT US nuclear codes? Is that not what was reported?
I'm not arguing anything one way or another. The article stated nuclear codes of other countries. That was the only question.
So GFY prof....
Only you guys are talking about nuclear codes. No one else is.
(no message)
You may want to check the record there. As I recall you Chris and Tyrone made that claim
Almost immediately.
I promise I never said anything about "nuclear codes"
Info on nuclear weapons can mean many things.
Not "codes."
Nuclear "stuff". I had to go back and search it.
I think they call that picking gnat sh*t out of pepper. Nevertheless...my sincerest apologies for mischaracterizing your latest prediction.
I teach a class on weapons of mass destruction. I know the terminology. Sorry, sparky.
(no message)
Is that an elective at Tulane?
If so, why?
Thanks for the laugh.
(no message)
You know there's a simple way to verify...do a board "Search"...I have...you're "Making Stuff Up"...
why do you do this...and then double down on a provable mis-statement?...not he first time, either...
Tyrone can't answer, he got a top secret clearance. Twice!
I think one of them was when he caddied for the Babe.
As for me, I’m confident i never wrote the word “codes”.. and I only recall
you Trumpians using that word. Probably because you all reiterated FOX TV rage.
(Fucking iPhone)
Then I apologize to you. I know Chris did. And I'm 99.9% Ty did as well.
If you say you didn't make that claim, then I believe you.
Fact check: False!
(no message)
You don't expend much thought before posting...that Top Secret information can be of immense value
to our enemies...how much do we know about their capabilities?...how about our allies and their capabilities?...how was this information gathered?...what are the underlying references?...sources?
Are you beginning to see why folks at your FBI and CIA are very nervous about this?...open your eyes and ears to what's going on...this is not a movie...this is real.
So that's a yes then? So not US codes.
So much for espionage. Read the statute. Asshole.
Your dipsomania issue is shining through.
(no message)
What is wrong with you?...do you not see the danger? How can you be so blase'?
btw, no final word on ALL the other Top Secret, or TS/SCI documents as yet (as if we'll ever know the details of each and every one))...it's pretty clear you never had to get a Top Security Clearance and understand concepts like "Need to Know"...no way we'd even be having this conversation.
I would imagine lots of folks don't have this clearance. What a silly thing to say.
I'm sure you have though. Or at least a close family friend....
Asshole.
You bet I've gotten a Top Secret Clearance...twice...and this issue is anything but SILLY.
(no message)
Now this is a funny post, that's gold Jerry!
(no message)
Seriously, this whole thing is about the theft of classified to top secret documents.
by a ex- president and To defend the indefensible is both astounding and astonishing.
Republicans/GOP should be absolutely ashamed to defend #45 for this.
Washington Compost. Same newspaper with 15 corrections to 1 article.
(no message)
Kinda blows up your attacks about nuclear secrets not found at Mar a Lago, doesn’t it.
I guess we should call your posts, coalash pits!
MSM BS
(no message)
Carrying water for a criminal. Amazing.
(no message)
A leak from the DOJ to WaPo negative to Trump - as expected. Reinforces witch-hunt view.
Let’s set aside the information a moment since we have no way to know at this juncture whether the “unnamed sources” article is true - especially from the WaPo who has lied to hurt Trump on multiple occasions. Let’s also set aside the possibility of planted evidence which will forever hang over this mess because of what the FBI did.
Why was this leaked? Is that what a professional, non biased govt agency does when it is already fighting for its credibility?
Why has there been no leaks against the Biden Admin after 7years of leaks against Trump?
If you argue that Biden is too clean, remember that The FBI was just caught illegally protecting Biden wrt his son’s laptop which shows evidence of Biden using influence to enrich himself and his family illegally.
This tactic by the DOJ simply confirms their ill intent toward Trump.
Or, it tells Americans what is really happening, “Renfield”!
(no message)
Liberalism Rule #1 loyal Renfield. And Leaking DOJ info is both illegal and biased.
And, of course, it is a large assumption to believe this at this point.
Mind numbing.
(no message)
DJT must have been accumulating all those docs since he threw his lunch against the wall...
I'm still wondering who gave him the "Shopping List"...and helped him access them...IMO lots of folks are going to be handed subpoenas and indictments as this plays out....meanwhile, the "Minions" go about their merry way wondering what all the 'Hubbub' is about.
Link: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11187407/Highly-classified-documents-held-Mar-Lago-contained-foreign-nuclear-secrets.html
Nuclear codes. Of other countries. Not the US?
(no message)
It’s amazing how, now that the “Special Master” is happening there are now leaks.
Leaks that probably wouldn’t happen if there were no, SM.
Special master hasn’t been picked yet - need for clearance makes pool much smaller.
So much for that theory.
But as an aside, I find it interesting that you would choose to suspect the previously unknown SM of the leak rather than the DOJ who was responsible for hundreds of negative leaks against Trump to the very same WaPo, and many of the leaks proved to be lies.
Um, a SM has been granted. Nobody said one has been chosen.
You have a terrible habit of misreading posts and news reports.
And nobody, not once said the nonexistent SM was leaking information.
You really need to have someone read these posts to you and have them explain them too.
So, you are saying that since the DOJ didn’t get what it wanted, it started illegally leaking!…..
……I completely agree but never thought you would admit such. Thus, I interpreted your nonspecific post in the other direction. The direction you always take. Cool. We agree. I stand corrected.
Interesting point...being discussed by former CIA Chief Brennan this evening...can only imagine the
consequences for our national security...and the SM ploy only makes it worse. The 'Enemy' was truly "Inside the Wire" for four years.
John lacks some credibility.
(no message)
Link: https://www.rt.com/usa/475443-brennan-lied-to-congress/amp/
You’re still defending Trump for Helsinki? Marvelous! This just
explains the saying, “head in the sand” to a T.
Not really. Just showing I wouldn’t trust anything Brennan says.
(no message)
Ah, the Steele Dossier...check out the attached summary of those assembled notes...including this
excerpt...
-------------------------
Additionally, it reports:
the Russian regime had been behind the recent leak of embarrassing email messages, emanating from the Democratic National Committee (DNC), to the Wikileaks platform. The reason for using Wikileaks was "plausible deniability" and the operation had been conducted with the full knowledge and support of Trump and senior members of his campaign team....
The indictment of 12 officers of the Russian Main Intelligence Directorate of the General Staff (GRU) corroborates these allegations from Steele’s sources. In particular, the indictment alleges:
3. Starting in at least March 2016, the Conspirators used a variety of means to hack the email accounts of volunteers and employees of the U.S. presidential campaign of Hillary Clinton (the “Clinton Campaign”), including the email account of the Clinton Campaign’s chairman.
4. By in or around April 2016, the Conspirators also hacked into the computer networks of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (“DCCC”) and the Democratic National Committee (“DNC”). The Conspirators covertly monitored the computers of dozens of DCCC and DNC employees, implanted hundreds of files containing malicious computer code (“malware”), and stole emails and other documents from the DCCC and DNC.
5. By in or around April 2016, the Conspirators began to plan the release of materials stolen from the Clinton Campaign, DCCC, and DNC.
6. Beginning in or around June 2016, the Conspirators staged and released tens of thousands of the stolen emails and documents. They did so using fictitious online personas, including “DCLeaks” and “Guccifer 2.0.”
7. The Conspirators also used the Guccifer 2.0 persona to release additional stolen documents through a website maintained by an organization ([Wikileaks]), that had previously posted documents stolen from U.S. persons, entities, and the U.S. government. The Conspirators continued their U.S. election-interference operations through in or around November 2016. ot
---------------------
there's a lot more that the Steele Dossier got RIGHT....you'd have to be willfully ignorant or a cultist to not see the connection between the Trump campaign and Russia...the folks who are lobbing shells into Ukraine right now, with DJT cheering Putin on...
Who's side are you on?
Link: https://www.lawfareblog.com/steele-dossier-retrospective
Continue reading. I copied your last paragraph. They got a lot more of the Steele Dossier right you
Say. So you admit they lied. Ask the lawyer about this. Call Bob Mueller with your info on collusion.
there's a lot more that the Steele Dossier got RIGHT....you'd have to be willfully ignorant or a cultist to not see the connection between the Trump campaign and Russia...the folks who are lobbing shells into Ukraine right now, with DJT cheering Putin on.
I don’t need to read your garbage. It’s a known fact Brennan lied.
(no message)
Now do hunter's laptop. You're such a hypocrite. Remarkable really.
(no message)
Easy...the "Chain Of Custody" for that laptop is non-existent..."Tons" of files added AFTER it was
supposedly dropped off by Hunter...the owner of the shop can't even ID HB in court as the one he got it from...that's for starters...
You are so easily duped...
Oh, and your "Anger Meter" is pegging ;-)...take deep breaths...better yet, join the real world and vent that ire on someone who really deserves it...Donald J. Trump.
So the computer shop owner can’t ID Hunter in court. They had a trial. I didn’t know.
(no message)
You know chain of custody doesn’t apply to citizens right. Law enforcement it does. FBI got the
laptop and haven’t heard anything negative about how they got it. Nice try though.
Aside from the fact it's all been verified you mean?
With a widening federal investigation? Not angry. You're just an Asshole. A liar and a hypocrite.
Anger will be when trump walks. That's gonna be some funny stuff.
Even if - this somehow exonerates #45 stealing top secret American documents
from the whitehouse???
Absolutely not!
(no message)
Then, why keep defending him?
(no message)
I am in no defending him.
(no message)
John Brennan? Wasn’t he one of the 51 so called experts that lied about the laptop?
(no message)
Is this an addendum to your post below or something the NYT or FBI over looked?
(no message)
Do you want to re-ask that? Or maybe you will just reread the other post.
It might help when asking.
Ah so desu ka Kumosan.
(no message)
I guess you you’re more interested in attacking a post you don’t like, not actually having a
true conversation.
I know, you will send me a B mail how we have differences, again.
Ha Ha Ha, no Bmail for you today my friend. My response indicated understanding your posts. Oh well.
(no message)
we have nuclear weapons? The horror!
(no message)
Actually, Colonel Walter E. Kurtz said: "The horror, horror."
(no message)
Here it is
(no message)
Link: https://youtu.be/mPPGMNOLaMw
Danke. Enjoyed.
(no message)