I remember that Trump called the 2016 Iowa caucus rigged when Cruz won…
…but I didn’t know he called the Emmys rigged when the Apprentice lost.
Turns out he has a pattern.
Yet MAGA morons think the 2020 election actually WAS rigged. This time it’s not a complete lie! Sure, there’s no evidence…but he knows!
Thanks for the Frontline recommendation, Conor. Everyone should watch it.
Replies to: I remember that Trump called the 2016 Iowa caucus rigged when Cruz won…
Do you remember that Biden called Barack Obama...
"I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy. I mean, that's a storybook, man."
Just one memory of Joe's pattern of stupidity. There are many.
Memory lane can be a "bitch", man. History may be better to Biden than Trump, but it's close.
Prior to the 2016 NOV election, Trump claimed that the election was rigged.
But then he won, despite Hillary securing > 3 million popular votes.
She conceded that she lost. I say again, she conceded that she lost. She did not tell her supporters to storm the Capitol.
Outgoing President Obama made sure that the incoming Trump Administration was provided a smooth and full transition, consistent with every other outgoing Administration. It is what we fookin do in America.
Then along came Trump, the avatar of white nationalism, and the destroyer of democracy.
And you spent the last 6 yrs claiming Russia rigged the election. You & Trump are soulmates.
(no message)
Russia interfered in that election. Trump was their mark.
You should read Volume V. Russian interference in the 2016 election is a known fact, which justifiably tainted the Trump presidency from the jump.
I believe Trump was in bed with the Russians, but his Obstruction efforts (see Volume II of Mueller Report) were successful in preventing the Mueller investigation from tying the knot of a criminal conspiracy (Volume I of the Mueller Report). Hence, Trump gets the benefit of the doubt, making him a “mark” by all accounts. Helsinki removed any possible doubt.
History will not be kind to Trump and MAGA and all the false Gods whom you worship.
Link: https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/publications/report-select-committee-intelligence-united-states-senate-russian-active-measures
Haha! “It’s ok for the Left to do, but not for the Right to do”. Liberalism Rule #2
(no message)
Ah, D’s asked for Russia to interfere with elections. Genius.
“Russia, if you’re listening!”
I guess you forgot that from the way-back-machine.
Chaffe deployed.
(no message)
Influenced is now rigged? I guess history is no longer a bitch but
something for you to manipulate anytime you like.
Not a cult.
Completely different. Bwahahahaha! “One penis enlarger labeled with the name Austin Powers”
Yes comrade, Helsinki did happen.
(no message)
I rest my case your honor. The collusion spreader accuses others of spreading collusion. Boom.
(no message)
You love to post gobbledygook posts. Nothing changes.
(no message)
Deflection. No answer.
(no message)
Oh, she "conceded," did she?
(no message)
Yes. Please don’t be one of them.
(no message)
Yes. She did.
(no message)
Here's 12 minutes of democrats denying election results.
Including her.
But hey, she "conceded."
Link: https://youtu.be/XX2Ejqjz6TA
November 9th, 2016
Now when will you concede that President Biden won the 2020 election?
Link: https://www.npr.org/2016/11/09/501425243/watch-live-hillary-clinton-concedes-presidential-race-to-donald-trump
You're unsurprisingly missing the point.
But you know, and I know.
Quite the contrary.
Trump was the first candidate for President to reject the election results before, during, and after the votes were cast.
Your posts reflect that you joined that narrative — “pallets of fraudulent ballots”
Hillary never subscribed to such narratives, nor did she orchestrate a coup to overturn an election.
The usual conner lies.
Of course she sought to undo the election. That's what this entire 4-year Russia/Ukraine tantrum was about. Sour grapes.
Except that a GOP-Led Senate Intelligence Panel found that Russia interfered with the 2016
election...remember?...also, recall the meeting of a Russian attorney and Donald Trump, Jr...which he "Loved" when told damaging information would be available the summer/fall before the election?...and Paul Manafort (Campaign Manager) giving polling data to a Russian operative (Kilimnik)?
Change the names to "Clinton" or "Biden" and you're frothing at the mouth...except in reality it was your guy.
Link: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/senate-panel-finds-russia-interfered-in-the-2016-us-election
There is zero evidence that the outcome was affected.
You people wanted a coup, anyway.
Admittedly very difficult to quantify, but don't delude yourself into thinking there was 'Zero'
impact on the 2016 election as a result of all those 'conversations' between the Trump campaign and Russian intermediaries...here's one other 'facet' of the meddling that went on...remember Steve Bannon...Cambridge Analytica...FaceBook...and the Russians?
Now there's a REAL conspiracy for you to chew on ;-). Fortunately, all the players will be held accountable...and you are going to have to decide who's side you're on...the USA or Russia?
Link: https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/10/16/15657512/cambridge-analytica-facebook-alexander-nix-christopher-wylie
All nonsense. Sour grapes for you people.
(no message)
FYI...this is anecdotal, but just got off a Zoom call with friends who are definitely conservative..
every one of them wants Trump GONE...and reached that decision a long time before this latest disaster...admittedly, they have advanced degrees and can think for themselves.
This is not just Dems against Trump...just look at Bill Barr taking shots at DJT...he represents even more mainstream Republicans.
She conceded but in all the videos she calls him illegitimate. Got it. Pretty much par for the
course for her.
Whoops I think they forgot about this. Nice set up. Way to easy wasn’t it.
(no message)
Why do leftists hate the truth?
(no message)
And he is up 50 points. The party is run by cowards and dumb people.
Of course those two groups are not mutually exclusive.
You are correct about the Democrat party.
(no message)
Indeed. Who we vote for is a reflection of the voter, not the candidate.
(no message)
DJT really has these lib's panties in a bunch. Are you all even getting any sleep?
(no message)