Trump’s viper grifter pit is gonna lose one - Bannon doing the NYC perp walk.
Will he flip on #45?
Hope so!
Hope so!
Jack, he is a banker
and Jane, she is a clerk
and Jane, she is a clerk
Back to threaded view
Full conversation · 25 posts
-
Level 1
And when the Republicans regain control the Dems will be doing perp walks
Politics is just real life Game of Thrones-
-
-
Level 4
Well, ya had a chance and you blew it. - Oh well!
(no message)Jack, he is a banker
and Jane, she is a clerk-
Level 5
Just stating a fact…
The last two threads that were locked included your drivel. In fact, go back a few months and you’ll find more.
You are a boring fool who has nothing else to do but post here. Sad existence indeed.
We're all born bald baby!
-
-
-
-
-
Level 1
"We got him this time! Walls are closing in! Walls are closing in!"
Charlie Brown, Lucy, and the football. Charlie Brown, Lucy, and the football.-
-
Level 3
Renfield just suggested that Bannon might now flip on Trump which naturally inclines many to
believes that this was the motive for pursuing Bannon.
I fully understand why didn’t know that though.....I rarely fully read his posts anymore myself.
-
Level 4
Not really, Himmler. I was noting Bannon was Perp walked in NYC
for ripping off you gullible minions for millions.
And I asked the question, will he flip on your Aryan leader - meaning there really isn’t honor among thieving grifters. Bannon is the smarmy douchebag he’s perceived to be.
Jack, he is a banker
and Jane, she is a clerk
-
-
-
Level 2
Liberalism Rule #4 and #5 both in play here.
Baron VonZemo’s Rules of Liberalism:
Liberalism Rule #1 - accuse others of that which you are/do.
Liberalism Rule #2 - the rules apply to thee and not me
Liberalism Rule #3 - We know what is best, thus the ends justify the means.
Liberalism Rule #4 - We believe ourselves to be smarter.
i) Admitting mistakes undermines the premise of being smarter, ergo self correction is not
possible.
Liberalism Rule #5 - What didn’t work last time, will work next time (see 4 i.)
Liberalism Rule #6 - When we lose, change the rules. When we want to do something that is wrong, change the
definition to suit the goal
Liberalism Rule #7 - Appeasement is the best deterrent to (foreign-only) conflict.
-
Level 3
Dumb phrases from #MAGAcultmembers are in play all day long with you here.
You are the epitome of MAGAism.Jack, he is a banker
and Jane, she is a clerk-
-
Level 5
And yet you squirm to defend trumpism and the MAGA cult. Peculiar!
(no message)Jack, he is a banker
and Jane, she is a clerk-
Level 6
I fully support MAGA policy and it’s great results are it’s defense. I just want a better/younger
candidate. I will vote Trump in a heart beat.
I could care less if you libs try to marginalize what MAGA means.
-
Level 7
We know. We can hear you Goose-stepping when you post.
(no message)Jack, he is a banker
and Jane, she is a clerk
-
-
-
-
-
-
Level 2
Perfect. Make light he ripped off thousands of Americans for millions.
It’s just odd your group praises thieves and grifters - then pearl clutch when a BLM leader siphons funds and promotes nepotism.Jack, he is a banker
and Jane, she is a clerk-
Level 3
You couldn't care less about those thousands of Americans. You think they're bumpkins.
You and the other TDS sufferers could not handle him being elected and have tried everything possible, regardless how weak and meritless to first remove him from office, and then to try to prevent him from running for office again. Ya know, because you also care so deeply about "democracy." In fact, most of you claimed his election in 2016 was, wait for it, "rigged" by the Russkies. That, of course, doesn't count as denying election results because, like, duh, you're not Republicans.
You aren't fooling anyone but for the other people like you who surrendered your minds over this guy. It's a measure of your insanity that you will get more outraged about Trump than a sadistic child killer. Boy, are you guys going to whine like there's no tomorrow when your guy is given similar treatment.
-
Level 4
That’s a perfect Strawman, well done.
Oh and by the by, most if not all D’s on this board said the Russians interfered/influenced the 2016 election and nowhere did any one I know say the word “rigged”.
And back to the thread beginning - what do you feel about Bannon being perp walked to jail? And do you think he’ll flip on DJT? His stretch would be 5 - 15 on both counts, money laundering and fraud - prison terms would run consecutively.
Rikers Island is first stop.
Jack, he is a banker
and Jane, she is a clerk-
Level 5
Right, the Russkies just illegally manipulated millions of voters and colluded with Trump's campaign
Didn't rig it, though Got it.
If you believe what is stated in my subject line, and unless something has magically changed without announcement to the rest of us, you do believe it, then you believe that the 2016 election was indeed rigged. That's fine. Not once, not after Dems cried for years that the 2000 election was "stolen" or that the GOP somehow rigged the 2004 election results in Ohio, never did I pull a drama queen routine and declare that these allegations were threats to the republic and that the purveyors of these claims were enemies of the state. Life went on just as it had before those elections, just as your life has been unchanged by Trump, save for working yourself up into irrational hysteria over him.
What do I think about charging Bannon? Uh, I know what you know: this is an effort to go after every person in Trump's inner circle, and beyond. Give credit where credit is due: Dem politicians and talking heads vowed that Trump Administration officials would be targeted and harassed and they have made good on those promises. Unless something has changed under the law, I will be surprised if the evidence provided by the state will demonstrate that Bannon intentionally took money from donors, knowing that nothing promised would be delivered in terms of the wall.
-
Level 6
You’re right, you win. The US, Russia, China and other nations
don’t have programs by which they use operatives to influence and interfere to manipulate elections/voters for certain candidates outside their own borders.
As far as trump? Helsinki never happened and his claim as a candidate “Russia, if you’re listening “ never happened. These along with multiple fairly obvious though tangential connections to foreign adversaries and happenings never occurred.
Trump then, had no reason to pardon Manafort, Bannon, Flynn and Stone. None of them were connected to Trump and none of them were convicted of felonies in service to him. None were connected in anyway to foreign services.
And the last 7 years in America didn’t happen.
I dig your logic.
In reality, your conditioning has been effective.
As for the 2000 elections - rigged? Let’s say the thumb of certain political moves in the State of Florida with the assistance of SCOTUS shimmied the process of counting ballots.
But in the end we can use a popular phrase - it is what it is.
Jack, he is a banker
and Jane, she is a clerk-
-
Level 8
Thanks for proving my point from above.
(no message)Jack, he is a banker
and Jane, she is a clerk
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
End of conversation