I thought the national abortion bans would wait until the GOP controlled at least one house.
Link: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/09/13/abortion-graham-republicans-nationwide-ban/
(no message)
(no message)
I cannot access this article, so I cannot confirm this. Are my assumptions correct?
It’s going to be HR 1 if the GOP takes the house.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
To be clear, I want to ban it except in cases where mother’s life is actually threatened. I also don’t think decision on morality should be decided by popularity.
But this bill would be well within the mainstream of the world if you were under the impression that it is radical.
Because that means it is an attempt on part of some to impose their version of morality on others.
Those who don’t see human life beginning as soon as the sperm penetrates the cell will nonetheless be bound by that morality if the GOP takes over.
(no message)
I could help.
This isn't a ban by the way, so double wrong.
I'd probably go more like 20 weeks with exceptions where the mother's health is in danger.
This is the place where you get to say you don't care about the issue at all, zygotes, blah blah blah...
(no message)
But I suppose the flip side is also true.
Kill 'em all.
(no message)
In no particular order.
Feinstein and Pelosi would fill out the top 5. Schumer is on the watchlist.
Edit to add: McConnell and Chuck Grassley. This is quickly becoming a top ten list...
(no message)