NY Atty Gen: Trump family crime syndicate 'a staggering fraud which violated state criminal laws'.
(no message)
Link: https://www.politico.com/news/2022/09/21/trump-company-and-family-members-sued-by-ny-ag-over-alleged
Replies to: NY Atty Gen: Trump family crime syndicate 'a staggering fraud which violated state criminal laws'.
If it was a crime why only a civil suit?
And if all the loans were paid back there were no victims.
I want him eliminated but this might help him, especially since this AG ran on a promise to prosecute him. I think she meant persecute
Lower standard of proof in civil cases than criminal. No "beyond a reasonable doubt."
(no message)
Ouch. That tells the tale, doesn’t it.
(no message)
Maybe you should read the complaint. The sanctions sought will break Trump’s “empire.”
Real lawyers read the pleadings. Fact.
Link: https://www.politico.com/news/2022/09/21/read-ag-tish-james-trump-organization-lawsuit-00058030
Bingo!
(no message)
Forwarding all information to the IRS, the Feds in the Southern District, 1/6 committee
the DOJ and anyone who needs to have their information.
Lock up the whole Crime Family.
Didn't the Feds at SDNY already kick the tires on this?
They passed, but I guess the NY AG has some new angle.
It will never end.
This is a fascinating quote from the AG
While the sweeping relief James is seeking — subject to approval by a state court judge — would cripple many of Trump’s businesses, James acknowledged at her press conference that Trump’s lawyers recently proposed a settlement, which her office rejected. But she said her team would consider future proposals to resolve the case. “Our door is open,” the attorney general said.
So, the AG is shaking down The Trump Organization.
The single most audited human being in the history of the IRS, but this time....THIS TIME....they got him.
No hyperbole there!
(no message)
How was Canada?
(no message)
As always, a wonderful time with family and friends.
It was a somber occasion in remembrance of my younger brother but all in a good company.
Sorry to hear that, Jim.
(no message)
👍
(no message)
Sorry for your loss.
(no message)
Sorry to hear about your brother. That sucks.
(no message)
Thanks
(no message)
I'm sorry to hear that, Jim. That's rough.
(no message)
Thanks
(no message)
Do you have a source on that other than the former President?
The most audited human being in the history of the IRS is a hilarious statement.
Can you think of another?
Capone? Maybe. Not sure. Hyperbole ain't your thing. Got it. Point being the dude has had his teet in the wringer more than anyone and still buptkis.
You got him Lance. This time. It'll be different. You'll see. You'll ALL see.
Battered Trump Syndrome.
I have no clue. Nor do you. It was just a weird statement.
And please tell me how many posts I've made "getting" Trump since he left office. I'll bet it's zero. As I've said before, the Trump supporters exhibit as much, if not more, TDS than his opponents.
But, again, this was just about your weird statement. The only person that I have seen discuss the audit of the former President has been the former President. Not the best source.
Were you Lehigh's protege or was Lehigh your protege?
"I've never heard of this and know nothing about it, but I know you're wrong and it's weird and you must be overreacting."
Where did I say he was wrong?
Even if it were true, audits wouldn't catch alleged misvaluation of assets for lending (and other) purposes. So, yes, weird.
Incidentally, tax returns don't include 99% of the information for which Democrats were and are looking so I always thought that rabbit hole was strange for them to fall down. I think it was more about embarrassing President Trump for not being as rich as he says he is, which is also why he doesn't want to release them. I imagine he cares more about the portion of the press conference today that talks about his assets being (grossly) overvalued than getting sued.
And Lehigh is a good dude. I just do fewer drugs than him.
The resemblance is remarkable, n'est-ce pas?
(no message)
Weirder than kindergartners being gender fluid? I think not! No....you'll likely no stats on that.
But again hyperbole clearly isn't your forte.
I'll be over here. Holding my breath. On the Big Orange Meanie getting fitted for the Big Orange Jumpsuit.
You do you.
(no message)
And also with you.
(no message)
Are your really questioning sources on this board? We have “intelligent” people who link
The WaPo, NYT, NPR and CNN. Not sure you want to cross that bridge.
Cool
(no message)
Looks as though AG James has put her cards on the table for a deal...let's see if Trump takes it...
btw, regarding you not being a Trump supporter in any way...your posts have consistently taken his side in all matters...so, since you live in Oregon, you should recognize when something "Walks like a Duck...and Quacks like a Duck...it IS a Duck" ;-)...
Well, like most things we discuss, you're incorrect. So you've got that going for you.
Which is nice. Sounds like the Trumpsters already offered their deal, but it wasn't sweet enough for the AG. Cards are on the table alright. The Orange One of your Nightmares ain't guessed wrong yet.
Find a church?
I'll ask you again...back up your statement...opinions aren't going to cut it in your new profession
(no message)
What did you ask? I can't keep all your rambling straight. Am I a trump fan? No.
And I wouldn't worry too much about my training. So far there's been nothing but positive marks & feedback. Guess I am good at it.
I'm asking for you to explain what you think is incorrect...and why...just making a personal opinion
without substantive backup will never cut it in a profession that values "evidence"...do you disagree with that too?
Innocent? Dear child.
Please tell me you're not this naïve? Nowhere did I suggest Mr. Trump was innocent. That's just your gag reflex. Which as a San Francisconian is probably well developed. No like I said, you've got this all wrong.
Think like an attorney. That was among our first lessons. If I have time I'll read what the AG has put forward.
One can detest both Trump and those who weaponize the justice system against him simultaneously.
(no message)
Unlike the previous administration's "weaponization" (see Geoffrey Berman's recent book), this one
is doing it "By the Book"...unless you have a notable attorney who is part of today's DOJ making such claims...not a very good effort on your biased part.
The reasons for "Detesting" Trump are too numerous to list...we are just scratching the surface.
Some day you will look back in wonder at how naive you were,
They are all the same on both sides
One side has very recently Demonstrated their willingness to 'weaponize' the Justice System...I'm
waiting for the evidence that the Dems are that callous in their respect for the Rule of Law...if you get any...let us all know...until then, you shouldn't be making rash unfounded statements like that.
I'm in the process of reading Geoffrey Berman's book "Holding The Line"...right from the get-go, it's clear that the DOJ 'Rank & File' are the 'Right Kind of Guys, and Gals' whose moral compass points in the right direction...it REALLY matters who's 'In Charge'...thankfully, we have a President that not only shares their view, but has demonstrated it for a very long time.
Your ongoing support for Trump's career of crime is duly noted.
(no message)
Sounded like Jim is something you may want to stay away from. Just a bit of advice.
(no message)
Cripple!
(no message)
I was gonna say...Duly Noted??? BWAHAHAHAHAHA!
(no message)
Except I am in no way a Trump supporter, but OK!
It's a shake down. The AG all but admitted it. It's stupid.
But carry on.
Imagine that, one of our Board Lefty's Generalizing when they can't live a day without Donald.
(no message)
They'll get him this time!!
(no message)
Russia Russia Russia!
(no message)