A story posted today in Sports Illustrated hinted strongly that the NCAA will soon vote to allow players to transfer without sitting out a year. The writer suggests that this will give the players the freedom they deserve and could also lead to other changes, such as putting players under contract and paying them. The NCAA might also, according to the writer, change the rule that allows coaches to block another school from talking to one of his players.
What do you think about this possible rule change? Would it be good or bad for the players? For college sports? For the coaches? And, how do you think it would affect Notre Dame?
enough for some who think they're NFL or NBA bound.
ESPN has been pushing this year.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Totally bad idea. There will only be 8- 10 schools with a chance to win a NC. IT will be the end of college football as we know it.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
a year.
Who came up with the idea that players "deserve" the right to freely move from school to school. Another ESPN liberal BS proposal. Don't change a thing. Eliminate the 6th potential. Just tough luck. No avoiding losing a year, regardless of reasons that include penalties based on school or coach transgressions.
If there is no penalty for transfers, you will see unprecedented poaching by football schools, including all of the SEC, Oklahoma and Texas schools, Oregon, etc. Strangely, I could see the BIGInterger schools not participating.
(no message)