Not that it matters much since we're all in agreement, but football rules guru Pereira first tweeted to say the fumble call shouldn't have been overturned (inconclusive video did not show ball out of bounds) and then in response to people incorrectly thinking the ND player who came back onto the field from out of bounds wasn't allowed to touch the ball (he was, just needed to re-establish self backin bounds first, which he did).
Why do they have replay guidelines if replay officials are just going to wing it? No camera angle showed the ball on the boundary line or any player out of bounds while touching the ball. Not a single replay was conclusive about ajything other than the fact the on-field call should've stood.
Time to get rid of reviews. They still make too many mistakes and are very inconsistent on interpretation of rules. Especially what a catch is.
Good grief.
I get annoyed by terrible review decisions in games I don't even care about too. Nobody is blaming that call for the loss.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
momentum your attitude changes big time.
You’re a moron if you think momentum swings haven’t determined the outcomes of football games. The offense was set up in great field position to possibly take the lead, only to have a bullshit call by the refs reverse it. It could have been a much more competitive showing had that not occurred when it did.
(no message)
(no message)