or Clemson would have done better.
While I've joined in the post-mortem analyses and enjoyed reading them, the fact is if Alabama or Clemson would come up short at Georgia - and there's good reason to think they would, too - there would be plenty of bemoaning of their weaknesses and failures, too. Any team that loses any game, by definition, had shortcomings.
Maybe ND is a lot closer to elite than we think.
That game from getting ugly. ND should be ashamed of themselves.
(no message)
against a team of that caliber. The fact that they persisted was hardly a surprise. Pretty tough to win against the number 3 team, on the road, at night with 46 yards on the ground. Yet there we were on their 38 with plenty of time to win. The D played out of its mind and kept us in it. Given our struggles on O that’s about all we could have hoped for.
They had the ball near midfield one point down and Winbush was sacked and fumbled....game over
offside lb crashing in unblocked on the QB.
In 2017, it was Roquan Smith that caused Wimbush's fumble.
In 2019, the position (I don't know the player's name) crashed in unblocked and flushed Book.
I'd bet that the same offensive play was called!
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
I would not mind putting in Jurkovic/ Lenzy in place of Book/ Finke. TaRiq Bracy should start too at CB
(no message)
If you think that was "good" offense, you have a serious perception issue. The offense had basically one drive all day and scored a TD only after a fumble at the 5 yard line.
Georgia may have a good defense but our limp offense made it look better. No downfield passing whatsoever and the worst set of rbs in several years certainly doesn't help a poor offensive scheme.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
We did have a chance to win on the last drive But we need a difference maker at QB. We do not have one.
(no message)