Kudos to the great performance of Clark Lea and the Defense but against high caliber competition they would be on the field much to much because of our inability to control the ball with a power running game. So the answer to my question has to be No. The best defense left on our Schedule is Michigan so we will see.
(no message)
2002's defense was very good, and very lucky. Unfortunately, the offense was pretty anemic (trying to make Carlyle Holiday run a West Coast offense was silly), and we got badly exposed against BC and USC, especially when our luck ran out.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
also come back to the ball and run diagonal to the sideline for the second one that the guy dove for and got.
(no message)
Grades:
Defense A+
Ground Game: A
Ian Book B+
Special Teams: F-
(no message)
(no message)
Mich is 22. Let's see what happens.
(no message)
(no message)
Unless you have the same questions of Georgia, not sure why this is even up for debate.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
only lost by 3 points.
The offense looked inept that game, just like it did for the last 3 quarters of Virginia
(no message)
The question wasn't if the offense was competitive, but does it have to be?
ND's wasn't, and they kept it close against a potential playoff team, on the road. So the answer as we know it now, is potentially, NO it doesn't have to be competitive on offense to have a competitive game.
(no message)
(no message)
for the playoffs