Brady 3 - 2
10 TD’s - 2 Int
2 SB MVP
Joe 4 - 0
11 TD’s - 0 Int
3 SB MVP
This is worse than anything DonMiller has posted by a mile.
Quite a few I'd take over Brady but Montana is the G. O. A. T., Brady is the beneficiary of Belichick's schemes and top 10 Defenses and GREAT PLAYOFF DEFENSES that allowed an average of just 3.2ppg in 4th Quarters in AFC-C/SB!
(no message)
There are probably are probably a dozen qbs who would have rung up the same results had they been in their shoes.
Montana 95.6
Brady. 90.5
Joe played better against the best teams than did Brady.
But neither comes close to Bart Starr. His qb rating is 104.8, which gives him the best post season qb rating in NFL history....
Of course, there are a gazillion QB's who would not have taken maximum advantage of these opportunities... so they deserve credit for that.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
3-2? He's 6-3
18 TD - 6 INT
4 Superbowl MVP's.
I'm a Joe guy, but Am I missing something?
I used to be a Joe fan, but have heard way too many stories about him treating fans like shit, so I'll call it without the ND glasses on.
Ran into him a couple times, once in a Little Italy restaurant. He was with some bangin hot chick. He was personable enough. That's disappointing if he acted poorly at other times...
(no message)
And looking at it in an unbiased fashion, Brady is better. Won more big games, gone to more Super Bowls, done it with a bunch of different personnel around him. Simply put, he doesn't have to prove it because he is.
(no message)
(no message)
Bradshaw. Beat Staubach twice and Tarkenton once.
Makes a difference.
(no message)
(no message)
In this case, Jumping Joe....
Just like the difference between APB and RB.
(no message)
(no message)