Menu
UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting
  • Football
    • 2024 Notre Dame Football Schedule
    • 2024 Notre Dame Roster
    • 2024 Notre Dame Coaching Staff
    • Injury News & Updates
    • Notre Dame Football Depth Charts
    • Notre Dame Point Spreads & Betting Odds
    • Notre Dame Transfers
    • NFL Fighting Irish
    • Game Archive
    • Player Archive
    • Past Seasons & Results
  • Recruiting
    • Commits
    • News & Rumors
    • Class of 2018 Commit List
    • Class of 2019 Commit List
    • Class of 2020 Commit List
    • Class of 2021 Commit List
    • Archives
  • History
    • Notre Dame Bowl History
    • Notre Dame NFL Draft History
    • Notre Dame Football ESPN GameDay History
    • Notre Dame Heisman Trophy Winners
    • Notre Dame Football National Championships
    • Notre Dame Football Rivalries
    • Notre Dame Stadium
    • Touchdown Jesus
  • Basketball
  • Forums
    • Chat Room
    • Football Forum
    • Open Forum
    • Basketball Board
    • Ticket Exchange
  • Videos
    • Notre Dame Basketball Highlights
    • Notre Dame Football Highlights
    • Notre Dame Football Recruiting Highlights
    • Notre Dame Player Highlights
    • Hype Videos
  • Latest News
  • Gear
  • About
    • Advertise With Us
    • Contact Us
    • Our RSS Feeds
    • Community Rules
    • Privacy Policy
  • RSS
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Home > Forums > Football Message Board
Login | Register
Upvote this post.
0
Downvote this post.

All college sports eyes should be on the SCOTUS

Author: BaronVonZemo (59919 Posts - Joined: Nov 19, 2010)

Posted at 5:39 pm on Mar 31, 2021
View Single

there will be a whole slew of schools that will drop out of the "business of athletics" if this ruling goes against their hopes. The scope of the case is deceptive since it will most certainly lead to bolder & bolder demands, and also one has to remember that Title IX will have to be applied applied (people often forget about this and the potential cost which will force many schools to drop sports).

I don't foresee our school, Notre Dame, staying in the number of sports that it presently does in Men and Women's athletics if payment models ensue, and we are one of the rich programs - though not tax payer funded.

Change is coming. I guess we will seee how big that change is going to be.


Link: https://www.espn.com/college-sports/story/_/id/31172473/supreme-court-questions-validity-amateurism-ncaa-business-model

This message has been edited 1 time(s).

Replies to: All college sports eyes should be on the SCOTUS


Thread Level: 2

It's roughly a $10-$15 Billion dollar industry. Anyone who tells you it's about amateurs is a liar.

Author: oldirish (9328 Posts - Joined: Oct 8, 2011)

Posted at 8:27 pm on Apr 1, 2021
View Single

And they are probably taking home at minimum 6 figures a year from the "amateurs" that are generating all the money.

Thread Level: 3

So we are coming for the athlete and not the brand? Yet our liking a player is based solely on

Author: BaronVonZemo (59919 Posts - Joined: Nov 19, 2010)

Posted at 9:00 am on Apr 2, 2021
View Single

whether they choose our team and not another.

It’s the gold helmets and school that are the draw. That is what is deserving of most of the money. Anonymous people with football talent are placed in the uniforms each year, and the business lives on. And at ND, the kids are given 75k a year in the form of free tuition with a quality degree and amazing post graduation contact network.

Let’s not pretend that the kids are not being reimbursed, and also let’s not pretend that people would be paying to see any of these athletes perform in football gear outside of the school that they cheer for.


This message has been edited 1 time(s).

Thread Level: 4

Let's not pretend the schollie money is = to revenue. See below.

Author: oldirish (9328 Posts - Joined: Oct 8, 2011)

Posted at 10:30 pm on Apr 3, 2021
View Single

(no message)

Thread Level: 2

There's a lot to be said where we are able to call NCAA athletes, professionals. They are paid with

Author: jimbasil (52634 Posts - Joined: Nov 15, 2007)

Posted at 8:12 pm on Mar 31, 2021
View Single

an education and a very expensive one at that.

The NCAA has only itself to blame through poor management and greed for cases like these to come along.

Football being a major culprit in this.

The "Power 5 conferences" will do much better than the smaller conferences -

The NCAA has created a fixed price for labor and that isn't fair to the athletes. TV rights and TV productions
with bowl games becoming playoff games and hours and hours of sports broadcasting with big-time advertising dollars
pushing the programming, there's no way athletes shouldn't have financial rewards. But in doing so, they're no longer
amateurs -


Jack, he is a banker
and Jane, she is a clerk
Thread Level: 3

It doesn't even remotely come close to the revenue they generate for the school. Not even close.

Author: oldirish (9328 Posts - Joined: Oct 8, 2011)

Posted at 8:27 pm on Apr 1, 2021
View Single

(no message)

Thread Level: 4

112mm/98 = That's $1.142 million per player and only roughly 85 get scholarships

Author: oldirish (9328 Posts - Joined: Oct 8, 2011)

Posted at 9:27 pm on Apr 1, 2021
View Single

85*35k per year is only 2.97mm annually in scholarship "cost". I'm hardpressed to get even close to saying these guys are "paid" by getting scholarships.

Give them the choice of a fair share of the gross revenue from their sport OR a scholarship. Their choice. The proof in value will be in what they choose.


Link: https://slapthesign.com/2020/02/29/notre-dame-football-comparing-financials/#:~:text=However%2C%20Forbes%20ranks%20Notre%20Dame,%24112%20million%20in%20annual%20revenue.

This message has been edited 2 time(s).

Thread Level: 3

The athletes will determine if they're paid enough, not the unis...

Author: ripperduck (3083 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 11:23 am on Apr 1, 2021
View Single

You may think that an education is too expensive. It may very well be. But, that doesn't mean it's any more valuable than when it was fraction of the price. Many athletes have said their sport mandated activity preceedes their capacity to get a proper education. Harbaugh said that about his time as a Michigan quarterback. The athletes are now organizing in order to strike a far better deal. Some unis ADs will not survive as presently configured. That isn't important because many unis themselves won't survive as presently configured..,

Thread Level: 4

I absolutely agree. The narrative being sold about the "scholarship" is bs and hiding the real $$

Author: oldirish (9328 Posts - Joined: Oct 8, 2011)

Posted at 9:30 pm on Apr 1, 2021
View Single

being made off these guys.

Thread Level: 3

The NCAA fought against the current TV proliferation.

Author: Shadow_of_the_Dome (4618 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 8:50 pm on Mar 31, 2021
View Single

40 years ago they saw what would happen if conferences started striking their own TV deals. They lost in the SCOTUS.

Don’t blame that issue on the NCAA, it was the conferences that were part of the CFA, followed shortly thereafter by ND’s deal with NBC.


Link: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/468/85/

This message has been edited 1 time(s).

Thread Level: 4

Ah, you're right - I think of them as one in the same when I shouldn't.

Author: jimbasil (52634 Posts - Joined: Nov 15, 2007)

Posted at 9:12 pm on Mar 31, 2021
View Single

Let's leave it as Conference Greed - team greed.

Jack, he is a banker
and Jane, she is a clerk
Thread Level: 2

Podcast and transcript now posted.

Author: Shadow_of_the_Dome (4618 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 7:06 pm on Mar 31, 2021
View Single

Listened to the first half on the drive home. Worth a listen. ACB’s questioning was also interesting, including questions on impact on coaches salaries and women’s sports.

Link: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/audio/2020/20-512

Thread Level: 3

Title IX is untenable if athletes are paid-it was not designed for this contingency. many colleges

Author: BaronVonZemo (59919 Posts - Joined: Nov 19, 2010)

Posted at 12:44 am on Apr 1, 2021
View Single

will bail, and thus I suspect that many young men and women will be without scholarships in the future because their are less programs still playing those sports.

Thread Level: 4

It is also untenable if biological men can play on women’s teams

Author: CC72 (16793 Posts - Joined: Sep 5, 2010)

Posted at 6:03 pm on Apr 1, 2021
View Single

(no message)

Thread Level: 2

I remember reading NCAA v. Oklahoma Board of Regents in Law School

Author: Shadow_of_the_Dome (4618 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 6:01 pm on Mar 31, 2021
View Single

That was the beginning of the end to amateur athletics at the college level.

Close
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • RSS