Looking like our weakest link is Special Teams, esp FG unit/kicker. This is an issue imho.Thoughts?
(no message)
Replies to: Looking like our weakest link is Special Teams, esp FG unit/kicker. This is an issue imho.Thoughts?
Welp guess I'm totally wrong I missed game and only saw highlights. My bad.
(no message)
Tough group here at times. Kicking really was a non issue. Both have very strong legs.
(no message)
For sure lol. Our FG kicker is 1 for 3. That's a pretty terrible stat imho but all good.
(no message)
Yes it is, but it's a great example of the phallacy of looking at the game only through the stats
What if a kicker had tried 6 kicks of over 60 yds in last second situations. If he makes two of those, that's pretty good, yet his pct looks really bad.
The missed FG against Navy wasn't great, but the miss against NC state wasn't a bad miss. It was a low percentage kick, and he barely missed it. He has showed off his strong leg each time he has been on the field. Both misses have hooked slightly left at the end. That is something that can be worked on and adjustments be made.
Were we watching the same game?
(no message)
What the hell were you watching he hit a key 54 yarder early and hit the upright very high on a 56
yarder. Our punter is pretty good too although he needs to not hit line drive punts but he flipped the field once. Our kickoff and punt returns definitely need improvement.
Wow. Weird post. No one who watched the game thinks our kicking game is a problem.
(no message)
The PK is awesome.
He has an NFL leg.
Is this some kind of joke..
..are you still drunk?
The kid made a 54 yd FG and hit upright on a 56 yd attempt...on a messy field. WTF are you talking about?
I think all but 1 kick were touchbacks too
(no message)
Having KO's go to the back of the endzone for once has been nice!
(no message)
Yeah, he had one go out of bounds late in the game.
(no message)
Consent Management