ACC admitted they shouldn’t have reviewed the punt mark, but what are the consequences for those who
committed this inexplicable, unforgivable error that had almost assuredly cost us the game and prevented the ACC from having ND break the all time consecutive win against the conference record (which is now at 30 despite their efforts)?
The review booth guys who also called down about a ludicrous targeting penalty which kept Dukes drive alive.
If these officials are not fired, then their words mean nothing, and no message is sent to others thinking of doing the same.
Replies to: ACC admitted they shouldn’t have reviewed the punt mark, but what are the consequences for those who
This is all on AD, its been going on for years
Time to publically assail AC C refs and threaten departure of change is not forthcoming.
If the incoming AD cares more about winning
and player safety (still can't believe Torii Hunter got up at Texas in 2016, thought he was dead for sure) than squeezing every penny he can out of every contract, then it'll get changed. Swarbrick has shown, over and over, that he cares more about those pennies than his players.
Yeah, I'm getting more angry about no actions being taken than the officiating being unfair.
(no message)
The HFC has the responsibility to speak up to the officials during the game
(no message)
He's done that. The officials are guilty of natural human errors and perhaps a little natural bias.
(no message)
"little natural bias." I find this comical given the non-calls against OSU.
(no message)
I thought a "little natural bias" was more appropriate than they were completely biased.
(no message)
I hear ya.
(no message)