(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
it could be. I love the way Hamilton covers and his tackling is amazing. Apparently he is Ray Lewis' favorite player on defense for the Ravens, so that tells you something too. The tackles in the open field being so sure are particularly impressive. Even the tackle on Edwards Hellaire who has great leg strength when he tackled him high in the open field and did not allow Hellaire to use leverage, was absolutely great. Nice to see Tranquill play well too.
If you have a QB who can extend plays like that it is very difficult to cover a tight end the caliber of Kelce. You just don't want to give Hamilton credit for how well he is playing because you are the most cynical guy here. Just stop trying to criticize Hamilton, he had as good of coverage as you could have on Kelce on the one TD play and has been all over the filed making great plays. Announcers are gushing about him. He and Kelce and a great moment after the game. What respect for each other!
I have been praising Kelce, and praising Kansas Ciry
I guess that makes me cynical huh? I guess you must like Baltimore. What a weird fuck you are.
that back. However for you to mock me for being an old man and a weird f*ck shows how little you respect the values you claim to have. I am 73 but I don't consider myself old just older. On a later comment you did blast Hamilton saying he was "owned" by Kelce. Yes, you may not be stupid but that was a stupid comment. As I said before with the combination of Mahones' ability to extend plays a receiver getting "open" against coverage is not abnormal or being owned. Besides on the TD, which was the really only play that Hamilton "got beat", he had great coverage but the execution by the QB and tight end were prefect which enabled the play to be made rather than the coverage being bad. Also they were in a zone defense much of the first half. Yeah, stupid comment from not a really stupid person.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)