(no message)
Link: https://www.miamiherald.com/betting/article277035673.html
Let the annual extreme, overhype begin.
(no message)
also in this discussion last year wasn't he? How'd that turn out?
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
While I'm grateful that Javon McKinley stepped up his game and became a reasonable occupant of the WR1 position, he was far from what we should have expected a WR1 to be. He wasn't quite as good as Boykin in 2018, much less Claypool in 2019.
The WR corps wasn't very good that year, and Book made the best of it as he could.
(no message)
(no message)
Let's hold off on Heisman talk.
and Vegas is right more than they're wrong.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
..and if you don't factor for that, he's 12th as Donnie boy said because they misplaced Jackson Arnold +2500 on their list.
I based my response on Don's original list. He said Top 10.
He was 11th on that list. Or 12th considering the misplacement. Either way he was not in the top 10 as originally stated. BTW, You don't "factor in" ties. It's the number of guys in front of him. Like golf.
Whatever dude.
When it's odds, not a performance measurement, you do factor for ties because in Vegas' eyes there is no difference between two guys with +900 odds, or three guys with +2000 odds.
If those odds shift, fine...but for right now Riley has the 7th highest odds of winning the Heisman. That is a factual statement.
It's not rocket surgery dude.
I am not going to participate in a locked thread because of some nitpicking pissing contest.
It slogs the board and is tangential to ND football.
You of all people should know that.
Parse away.
Now go ahead and get your last word in a thread that is facing imminent lock down...lolololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololol
(no message)