I'm not going to lie, dropping 66 on Purdue feels good.
I hope they drop 70 on Louisville.
Kind of reminds me of when Rocket Ismail played for Notre Dame
Invincibility with no vulnerability
Invincibility with no vulnerability
Back to threaded view
Full conversation · 20 posts
-
Level 1
Been waiting awhile for it.
(no message)"Put a Riddell on somebody and be the most physical team in the country until the whistle blows." -
-
Level 2
Actually we did take our foot off the gas after halftime..
We could have probably scored 80+ if we tried to run it up.
"Leave No Doubt." -Marcus Freeman
-
-
Level 1
Loved it. Great crushing of Purdue. Keep it up.
(no message)Dead-eye Pete with 20 pounds of swingin' meat. -
-
Level 2
He's the best QB. Leonard plays because they think he has a higher ceiling but he'll never get it.
(no message)"Put a Riddell on somebody and be the most physical team in the country until the whistle blows." -
-
-
Level 4
You fell hard for the Leonard hype train. I'm sorry. Being sour about it doesn't help.
(no message) -
-
Level 5
Got ya a W today, didn't he?
Another idiot on this board that hasn't been to a single practice or meeting that thinks he/she has all the answers to team success.
How you, and your fellow know-it-alls, aren't heading a major program is incomprehensible. All that knowledge and wisdom just sitting behind a keyboard telling others how things should be, to be successful.
Incomprehensible, I say.
-
Level 6
Yeah. That 112 yards and 0 TDs should fire up some Heisman talk
Shiny toy was mediocre at Puke just as he is at Notre Dame. Funny how that worked out.
No buyer's remorse, I presume?
-
Level 7
He's better than Angeli (and I really like Angeli), that's why he's starting, deal with it.
It's called "stressing a defense" and RL's legs cause more stress than Angeli's arm can. Leonard's arm and legs are better than Angeli's arm, if that was hard to follow.
Feel bad for those of you that come on here just to try and be "right" about something, when you clearly don't know what you're watching or what you're talking about.
-
-
-
-
-
-
Level 2
Best passer for sure. RL ran 11 & completed 11 for 100/111 respectively.
(no message)Dead-eye Pete with 20 pounds of swingin' meat. -
Level 2
Mmmm, I would push back on "proved"...he certainly appears to be the better touch passer and
seems like a more than capable replacement should Riley struggle again, but he was playing against a defeated team when he came in.
I'm not taking anything away from his play, he looked got but I'm not sure I'm buying "proved"
"Leave No Doubt." -Marcus Freeman
-
End of conversation