That means you could have a 12 seed playing at home against a 5 seed, but that still makes more sense than having a clearly weaker team seeded automatically in the top four
(no message)
(no message)
This would make it so if a conference champion from a weaker conference was say 9-4 and ranked kinda low, they wouldn't get the double benefit of a first round bye and being boosted up to a beneficial bracket.
They would instead get the bye but would be seeded based on their ranking.
(no message)
while ALLLLLLLL the 2 loss SEC teams are below ND.
You are SO smart!
Would 8-1 ND be favored over 6-3 South Carolina?
Let me help you...NOTHING!
(no message)
their rankings based on who they think the best team is.
Vegas doesn't care who the best team is, all of their research surrounds where they think gamblers are going to put their money.
1. These are two different worlds
2. We don't have to guess about the committee rankings you are negatively speculating on, they already showed us what they think. They could have jumped Bama over Miami and ND, but they didn't. Why? Because the narrative you are spinning is trash.
of what they are saying.
Did you not see all the "experts" predicting both Bama and Ol Miss to jump ND..?
The committee had none of it...they are being perfectly fair to ND and we are right where we should be at the moment.
And if Tenn falls to Georgia and then Indiana falls to Tosu, we'll be at the #7 seed right where we should be...with a "chance" at the 6 seed depending how some other things go.
Couldn't be more fair...I'm highly impressed with the playoff committee at this point.
SOS just isn't high enough to warrant a higher seed after a loss like that.
In the CFP. Sadly we have a history of proving the naysayers right.