(no message)
The 3 best OL were gone and the best DT was gone. The Edge rushers group is deep but many came with warning labels and don't fit what the type of Edge rusher than Dennis Allen likes which is bigger/stronger versus lighter/faster. They also pick @ 39 and 41 so they can fill in those positions in they like the guys, probably RB and Edge rusher depending on who is available. Folks forget that the Bears added 3 OL and 2 DL guys in the off-season.
Really good teams need two TEs anyway, and the Bears only have one front line TE on the team (Durham-Smyth was picked up more for special teams than receiving skills) and while Kmet is a solid in-line TE, he isn't on anyone's top 15 TEs in the NFL and isn't going to be. Loveland will be a superior receiver to Kmet. You can split Loveland out as a WR type ala the top TEs in the game (Kelce/Kittle, etc) which isn't Kmet's strength as a TE.
Most pundits thought it was a toss-up between the Warren/Loveland. Warren is the better blocker of the two prospects, but Loveland is absolutely the better receiver. Who you take depends on your flavor of tea.
Fingers crossed.
I live in the Chicago area so it has been fun to watch the anguish of the last 15 years or so of Packers/Bears.
Because Chicago is a Bear town over any other local teams, the angst on Monday after every Bear loss to the Packers is a joy to behold. I fear that run is over.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
….and mind you, I watch ND TE’s
Ben Johnson does like 2 TE sets, so I can see them drafting a TE despite having Kmet.
But to pick anyone over Warren is just dumbass. On top of that, Loveland is overrated.
This is why the Bears are the Bears.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)