Bordering on absurdity.
(no message)
Wow...
We was incredible in 2003, 22 TD in 13 games 128 ypg.
Here's an interesting list:
Link: https://247sports.com/longformarticle/college-football-top-30-wide-receivers-of-the-century-devonta-smith-calvin-johnson-alabama-crimson-tide-usc-trojans-161318583/#1595866
Wonder how many on the panel saw people play pre-2000. Anyway, seems to overvalue NFL success.
Link: If it's not Scottish, it's crap
Is Brock Bowers really the best TE though? Among other WTFs.
I'm okay with Hershel Walker on the list. But Barry Sanders started only one season while in college. Now that one season is probably the greatest season a running back has ever had, but still should one great season put on the list. As pointed out, I think deference is given to those who had great NFL careers, and that looks like the case with Sanders.
If only one's college career is considered then the list has to begin with Tony Dorsett IMHO.
(no message)
Should it be driven by stats or moments of greatness?
The list is all time AP All-Americas. So does one only consider their play in the seasons in which they made AP All-America? Too vague to have any objectivity.
To me, this list, as nonsensical as it is, is made for the purpose of getting hits and making people talk about it. So, I guess they succeeded in that goal.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
But the whole concept is click bait.
There are quite guys from 50s 60s and 70s selected.
Tim Tebow is an odd choice.
I wouldn't take that list too seriously. Those are 12 biased sportswriters compiling a list of their personal preferences.
Besides, such an "all time" list that doesn't include Ross Browner on it is something I simply discard.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)