Potentially puts super conference in jeopardy. Mediocre football schools happy to cash in and get the moolah.
Link: Mo money mo money
(no message)
Conferences are antithetical to the super league. Enough good teams out there that you don’t need to revenue share with bad teams to produce competition.
the success of the conference brethren?
Is that something you what to sign up for long term?
If you have a really good competitive program, shouldn’t you get the check for that? Is it kind of like tv the show Entourage, if I’m remembering right…there’s the star, and there’s all the “buddies” whose lifestyle he pays for. Turtle & the gang? Is that right?
Just my 2 cents, as always I could be wrong
God bless everyone & Go Irish 🍀
(no message)
Michigan State pays Central Michigan $1.5 million each time they play. Much cheaper than cutting Central Michigan in on the spoils of the BIG. Give them half the gate and the rest of the cash money is yours.
Isn't that likely how they would structure such a deal?
(no message)
(no message)
while I don’t know the deep specifics on either “deal” on the face of it, I’m a hard No.
Just my 2 cents, as always I could be wrong.
God bless everyone & Go Irish 🍀
from a cost standpoint.
(no message)
OSU and Michigan are loath to share their potential equity with the other peons in the Big? Conference..
But a Superconference might just mean that most schools are relegated to minor league status and that the Big Boys conference would essentially be nothing more than the minors of pro football.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
departments of the universities as they were in the past?
(no message)
due to being considered part of a school's "educational mission" (my eyes are rolling on that one), I'd imagine those athletic departments are NOT considered autonomous.
Do u mean how public schools funded by public entities can use the privatization investment?
I’m sure lawyers have figured it out but also seems like a lawsuit waiting to happen.
(no message)
(no message)