Menu
UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting
  • Football
    • 2025 Notre Dame Football Schedule
    • 2024 Notre Dame Roster
    • 2025 Notre Dame Coaching Staff
    • Injury News & Updates
    • Notre Dame Football Depth Charts
    • Notre Dame Point Spreads & Betting Odds
    • Notre Dame Transfers
    • NFL Fighting Irish
    • Game Archive
    • Player Archive
    • Past Seasons & Results
  • Recruiting
    • Commits
    • News & Rumors
    • Class of 2018 Commit List
    • Class of 2019 Commit List
    • Class of 2020 Commit List
    • Class of 2021 Commit List
    • Archives
  • History
    • Notre Dame Bowl History
    • Notre Dame NFL Draft History
    • Notre Dame Football ESPN GameDay History
    • Notre Dame Heisman Trophy Winners
    • Notre Dame Football National Championships
    • Notre Dame Football Rivalries
    • Notre Dame Stadium
    • Touchdown Jesus
  • Basketball
  • Forums
    • Chat Room
    • Football Forum
    • Open Forum
    • Basketball Board
    • Ticket Exchange
  • Videos
    • Notre Dame Basketball Highlights
    • Notre Dame Football Highlights
    • Notre Dame Football Recruiting Highlights
    • Notre Dame Player Highlights
    • Hype Videos
  • Latest News
  • Gear
  • About
    • Advertise With Us
    • Contact Us
    • Our RSS Feeds
    • Community Rules
    • Privacy Policy
  • RSS
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Home > Forums > Football Message Board
Login | Register
Upvote this post.
0
Downvote this post.

Notre Dame was more penalized today, 8 penalties for 81 yards vs. 5 for 41 yards for Pitt.

Author: whatsamataU (25547 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 4:54 pm on Nov 15, 2025
View Single

(no message)

Replies to: Notre Dame was more penalized today, 8 penalties for 81 yards vs. 5 for 41 yards for Pitt.


Thread Level: 2

And your surprised….I hate those f$&kin’ Ku Kluxer ACC pricks

Author: NEPA Irish (1074 Posts - Joined: Aug 24, 2009)

Posted at 5:17 pm on Nov 15, 2025
View Single

(no message)

Thread Level: 3

You are an odd duck

Author: WoodstockIrish (15000 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 8:08 pm on Nov 15, 2025
View Single

(no message)

Thread Level: 3

Not at all . Take out the last two give me’s at it close.

Author: whatsamataU (25547 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 5:29 pm on Nov 15, 2025
View Single

(no message)

Thread Level: 2

A BIG shout out the the ACC for the anti ND twitter post - it forced them to be clean.

Author: BaronVonZemo (62010 Posts - Joined: Nov 19, 2010)

Posted at 5:03 pm on Nov 15, 2025
View Single

(no message)

Thread Level: 2

They did not have any critical bad calls against them other than the facemask&pass roughing at end.

Author: BaronVonZemo (62010 Posts - Joined: Nov 19, 2010)

Posted at 5:02 pm on Nov 15, 2025
View Single

that I can remember.

This message has been edited 1 time(s).

Thread Level: 3

I was at the game. They missed a few on ND that could have been called.

Author: Hensou (9722 Posts - Joined: Dec 21, 2022)

Posted at 5:09 pm on Nov 15, 2025
View Single

The goal line review play on the Pitt non TD took forever.

Overall the refs were not a factor.


Thread Level: 4

Tell that to jim B..

Author: whatsamataU (25547 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 5:12 pm on Nov 15, 2025
View Single

(no message)

Thread Level: 5

I’m pretty sure he has me on Ignore.

Author: Hensou (9722 Posts - Joined: Dec 21, 2022)

Posted at 5:57 pm on Nov 15, 2025
View Single

Full disclosure . I am not saying the ACC crew called a great game. They were low mediocre. But they did not determine the final outcome.

Thread Level: 6

What an Imbecile. Understand

Author: whatsamataU (25547 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 7:40 pm on Nov 15, 2025
View Single

(no message)

Close
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • RSS