And espn points out we only beat Pitt by 22. It’s silly that it matters but it does
(no message)
Replies to: And espn points out we only beat Pitt by 22. It’s silly that it matters but it does
Statistics don’t matter for the playoffs said several.
(no message)
I got news for you...
if Miami eventually passes ND in the playoff rankings, it will not be because of the difference in the scores of the Pitt games or the Syracuse games. Some of you need to walk outside and take several deep breaths.
Well, Narduzzi sure can't perform in those "games that matter."
(no message)
42-7 is what matters now. Our score v. Pitt was Canes target.
So starters play the whole game. Canes beat Stanford 42-7 in a game that was close at halftime in Miami. Irish Know what they have to do.
I'm just hoping that it doesn't end up being BC redux 🤮
(no message)
Here is the reality
ND deserves to be in because they are a top 10 team.
ND deserves to be out because they lost 2 games.
Miami deserves to be in because they are a top10 team.
Miami deserves to be out because they lost 2 games.
Both can gripe and moan, but neither should be in this position given their talent.
Exactly..
The loser of this race has done enough to be included...but also excluded.
Most accurate statements of the day
(no message)
Very silly. Miami beat 'Cuse by 28. ND beat Cuse by 63.
(no message)
They should also point out
That ND played their subs and took their foot off the accelerator. Miami left their starters in the whole game and threw for a TD with 41 seconds left when they had the game in hand and all they had to do was take a knee.
Not smart when you’re swimming with sharks.
(no message)
Correct, the committee watches the games.
(no message)
And guess what? Maybe that was stupid on the part of our coach?
(no message)
No, it shows some class
(no message)
I can't wait until the talking heads explode when MIA is ranked behind us when all is said and done.
(no message)
It might be class but it might Cost us. What is 70-7? Is that class?
(no message)
Did we do that by leaving our starters in the whole game?
Come on. It was another game we took our foot off the accelerator. Subs played most of the second half.
Forget it, he is rolling.
(no message)
I get it and I understand. You are right we did it with backups.
But I don’t think anyone else realizes that unless u watch all games
That's the committee's job.
(no message)
Exactly
There are enough people watching the games that they can let the ones who didn't see them know what went on. That's the committee's job to know or find out and for the rest of the pundits that just want to compare the raw scores, that's just lazy.
Quit trying to interject common sense.
(no message)
Pitt threw a play action bomb with under a minute left
(no message)
Consent Management